COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SALMETEROL/FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE COMBINATION IN TREATEMENT FOR UNCONTROLLED ASTHMA IN VIETNAM

Lâm Tới Phùng, Thị Mai Phương Nguyễn , Quỳnh Trang Đỗ , Trà My Đỗ , Thế Duệ Ong, Thị Mai Hoa Nguyễn , Thị Thanh Vân Phan , Hoàn Lê Minh Nguyễn , Phansalkar Abhay, Hamouda Mohamed

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretide®) versus inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the treatment of uncontrolled asthma in Vietnam. Methods: A model-based cost utility analysis from payer’s perspective was conducted. The model consists of two main health states: disease without symptom and with symptom to simulate the natural history of the disease over a one-year time horizon with a weekly cycle. The parameter of the drug’s efficacy was derived from a published meta-analysis. The cost of drugs is collected from the results of bidding results and the results of price negotiations by the Ministry of Health. The cost of treatment is estimated based on the resources required according to treatment guidelines combined with clinical expert consultation multiplied by the technical service unit price prescribed by the Ministry of Health.  Results: salmeterol/fluticasone propionate dominates the ICS same dose or increased doses ICS in all scenarios of low, moderate, and high dose. The results of the sensitivity analysis confirm the robustness and reliability of the model’s results. Conclusions: For patients with inadequately controlled asthma on ICS, choosing an ICS/LABA regimen such as salmeterol/fluticasone is a cost-effective solution.

Article Details

References

1. Tran Thuy Hanh and Nguyen Van Doan, Epidemiology of adult asthmatic in Vietnam: results from cross-sectional study nationwide. Internal Medicine Journal, 2012. 42: p. 1-16.
2. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Results. 2020: Seattle, United States.
3. Phạm Huy Tuấn Kiệt, Vũ Văn Giáp, and Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hà, Chi phí y tế trực tiếp trong điều trị hen theo phân loại GINA dựa trên dữ liệu lớn từ Bảo hiểm y tế Việt Nam năm 2019. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021; 503(2): p. 169–72.
4. Bateman, E.D., et al., Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2004. 170(8): p. 836-44.
5. Shih, Y.-C.T., J. Mauskopf, and R. Borker, A cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line controller therapies for persistent asthma. Pharmaco-economics, 2007. 25: p. 577-590.
6. Ismaila, A.S., et al., COST-effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (Advair(®)) in uncontrolled asthma in Canada. Respir Med, 2014. 108(9): p. 1292-302.
7. GINA. 2023 GINA Report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Available from: https://ginasthma. org/2023-gina-main-report/.
8. Doull, I., et al., Cost-effectiveness of salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate combination inhaler in chronic asthma. Curr Med Res Opin, 2007. 23(5): p. 1147-59.
9. Oh, B.C., et al., Health-related quality of life in adult patients with asthma according to asthma control and severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol, 2022. 13: p. 908837.
10. Shepherd, J., et al., Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children aged 12 years and over. Health Technol Assess, 2008. 12(19): p. iii-iv, 1-360.