Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 15/03/2024
Abstract Views: 60
Views PDF: 64
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v536i1B.8838
Issue
Vol. 536 No. 1B (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn , K. H. ., Đinh , T. P. T. ., & Lê, T. V. A. . (2024). OUTCOMES OF SMALL INCISION LENTICULE EXTRACTION WITH PROPHYLACTIC CORNEAL CROSSLINKING IN HIGH MYOPIA AND THIN CORNEA. Vietnam Medical Journal, 536(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v536i1B.8838

OUTCOMES OF SMALL INCISION LENTICULE EXTRACTION WITH PROPHYLACTIC CORNEAL CROSSLINKING IN HIGH MYOPIA AND THIN CORNEA

Kiếm Hiệp Nguyễn , Thị Phương Thủy Đinh , Thị Vân Anh Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety and stability in myopic and astigmatic small‐incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with simultaneous prophylactic corneal crosslinking (CXL) in thin corneas.
Methods: A total of 48 eyes from 24 patients who underwent myopic and astigmatism SMILE with simultaneous prophylactic CXL were included in this retrospective study. All patients had a 12‐month follow‐up. A femtosecond laser was performed with LDV Z8 (Zeimer). CXL treatment was applied when the predicted stromal thickness was less than 300 μm. Results: The patients’ mean age was 20.58 ±3.12 years. The previous mean spherical equivalent was − 6.85 ± 1.80 (−9.75 to − 5.00) D. The postoperative mean spherical equivalent was − 0.50 ± 0.26 (−1.00 to + 0.25) D; 60% of the eyes had 20/20 or better; 81% of eyes had 20/25 or better; 60% were within ± 0.50 D; and 8.3% of the eyes changed 0.50 D or more between 3 and 12 months. Conclusion: Prophylactic CXL with simultaneous SMILE for myopia and astigmatism femtosecond laser surgery technique appears to be partially effective, safe, predictable, and stable after 12 months of follow‐up.

Article Details

References

1. Shah R et al. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: All‐in‐one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:127–37
2. Ganesh S, Brar S. Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction with accelerated cross‐linking (ReLEx SMILE Xtra) in patients with thin corneas and borderline topography. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:1–7.
3. Ng ALK, et al. Comparison of the early clinical outcomes between combined small‐incision lenticule extraction and collagen cross‐linking versus SMILE for myopia. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:1–7.
4. Osman IM, et al. Corneal safety and stability in cases of small incision lenticule extraction with collagen cross‐linking (SMILE Xtra). J Ophthalmol 2019;2019:1–10.
5. Ge Q, et al. Combined transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and corneal collagen cross ‐ linking for corneal ectasia after small‐incision lenticule extraction‐Preoperative and 3‐year postoperative results: A case report. BMC Ophthalmol 2018;18:1–5.
6. Wei R, et al. Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality early after implantable collamer lens V4c (ICL V4c) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction. Acta Ophthalmol 2020;98:e943‐50. doi: 10.1111/aos. 14459.
7. Konstantopoulos A, et al. Corneal stability of LASIK and smile when combined with collagen cross‐linking. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2019;8:21.
8. Torres‐Netto EA, et al. Similar biomechanical cross‐linking effect after SMILE and PRK in human corneas in an ex vivo model for postoperative ectasia. J Refract Surg 2020;36:49–54.