SCOPING REVIEWS METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS WITH RECURRENT NASAL POLYPS AFTER SURGERY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the results of treatment methods for chronic rhinosinusitis with recurrent nasal polyps after surgery. Methods: Scoping reviews, we use data on Pubmed to evaluate the results of treatment methods for chronic rhinosinusitis with recurrent nasal polyps after surgery. Results: There were 10 studies, of which 8 were medical treatment studies, 2 were surgical treatment studies, including 941 patients in this review, over the last 10 years. Four studies showed improvement in VAS scores; There are 5 studies showing improvement in SNOT 20/22 score; There is 1 study showing improvement in the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic index; There are 2 studies showing improvement in polyp density; There are 2 studies showing improvement in nasal obstruction; There are 2 studies showing improvement in polyp recurrence rate and time. Conclusion: Both medical and surgical treatments have been shown to be effective in improving symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, improving the quality of life for patients.
Article Details
References
2. Han JK, Kern RC. Topical therapies for management of chronic rhinosinusitis: steroid implants. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019;9(S1):S22-S26. doi:10.1002/alr.22344
3. Bachert C, Sousa AR, Han JK, et al. Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Treatment efficacy by comorbidity and blood eosinophil count. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;1 49(5): 1711-1721.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci. 2021.10.040
4. Kern RC, Stolovitzky JP, Silvers SL, et al. A phase 3 trial of mometasone furoate sinus implants for chronic sinusitis with recurrent nasal polyps. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018;8(4):471-481. doi:10.1002/alr.22084
5. Pirola F, Pace GM, Giombi F, et al. Outcomes of Non-Mucosa Sparing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (Partial Reboot) in Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: An Academic Hospital Experience. The Laryngoscope. 2023; 133(7):1584-1589. doi:10.1002/lary.30422