Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 25/03/2024
Abstract Views: 464
Views PDF: 215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v536i2.8929
Issue
Vol. 536 No. 2 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Trần , Q. H. ., & Đậu , X. Y. . (2024). LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY FOR URETERAL STONES AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 536(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v536i2.8929

LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY FOR URETERAL STONES AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Quốc Hòa Trần , Xuân Yên Đậu

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral stones at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Research subjects and methods: cross-sectional, retrospective description of 40 patients with confirmed diagnosis of ureteral stones and retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery to remove stones at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to November /2023. Results: 40 patients included 31 men (77.5%) and 9 women (22.5%). The average age was 54.18 ± 9.82 years old. (37 – 72 years old). Average surgery time was 70.0 ± 23.5 minutes. 100% success. Complications during surgery: 2 patients with peritoneal tear (5.0%), 1 patient with gonadal vein bleeding (2.5%), 2 patients with subcutaneous emphysema (5.0%). The average number of days in the hospital after surgery was 3.52 ± 1.1 days. Early complications after surgery: 1 patient had urine leakage, 1 patient had bleeding through drainage in a patient who restarted anticoagulation early. Conclusion: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery to remove ureteral stones is a minimally invasive, safe and effective method for upper 1/3 and middle 1/3 ureteral stones.

Article Details

References

1. Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, Wang G, Hou P, Meng J. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):50.
2. Brener ZZ, Winchester JF, Salman H, Bergman M. Nephrolithiasis: evaluation and management. South Med J. 2011;104(2):133-139.
3. Mousavi Bahar SH, Amirhassani S, Nouralizadeh A, ZerafatJou N, Rasiuli J. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Laparoscopy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: The Experience of Two Different Settings. Urology Journal. 2019;16(5): 448-452.
4. Deng T, Chen Y, Liu B, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones. World J Urol. 2019;37(8):1687-1701.
5. Trần Văn Hinh. Giải phẫu hệ tiết niệu. Các phương pháp chẩn đoán và điều trị sỏi tiết niệu. Nhà xuất bản Y học. 2013:9-24.
6. Wani MM, Durrani AM. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Experience of 60 cases from a developing world hospital. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2019;15(2):103-108.
7. Raheem AA, Alowidah I, Althagafi S, Almousa M, Alturki M. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stones: tips and tricks. Central European Journal of Urology. 2020;73(3):389-390.
8. Wang K, Wang G, Shi H, et al. Analysis of the clinical effect and long-term follow-up results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi (report of 206 cases followed for 10 years). International Urology and Nephrology. 2019; 51(11):1955-1960.
9. Vương Xuân Thủy. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị sỏi niệu quản 1/3 trên bằng phẫu thuật nội soi ngoài phúc mạc tại bệnh viện Việt Đức giai đoạn 2007-2009. Luận văn Thạc sỹ, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, Hà Nội. 2010.
10. Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Nanda B, Kumar N, Jha SK, Singh H. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. Journal of Endourology. 2015;29(11): 1248-1252.