Article Sidebar
Views pdf: 92
COMPARE THE COMPLICATION OF MINI WITH STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL) FOR THE TREATMENT OF SINGLE KIDNEY STONES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the complication of mini- with standard- percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of single kidney stones. Patients and Methods: The data of consecutive adult patients who underwent PCNL for the treatment of kidney stones, between December 2016 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All cases were performed in a prone position under fluoroscopic guidance. The nephrostomy tracts were dilatated to 26 F in standard-PCNL and to 16,6 F in mini-PCNL. A nephrostomy tube was inserted after PCNL. Study design: prospective cohort with comparison group. Complications of surgery were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo. Results: The study included 178 patients; 89 underwent standard-PCNL and 89 underwent mini-PCNL. The incidence (17,96% vs 24,27%, P = 0.048) and severity of complications were significantly lesser with mini-PCNL (P = 0.031). The complication transfusion rates did not differ between groups. Postoperative complications rates according to Clavien-Dindo classification was lesser with mini PCNL. Conclusions: The advantages of miniPCNL included a lesser incidence and severity of complications.
Article Details
Keywords
PCNL, standard PCNL (sPCNL), mini PCNL (mPCNL).
References
2. Gambaro G, Tzelves L, Skolarikos A, Kanbay M, Ortiz A, Cozzolino M. The new guidelines of the European Association of Urology on Urolithiasis: the urology–nephrology intersection. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2022;
3. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourological society guideline, PART I. The Journal of urology. 2016;196(4):1153-1160.
4. Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc. World journal of urology. 2015;33:235-240.
5. ElSheemy MS, Elmarakbi AA, Hytham M, Ibrahim H, Khadgi S, Al-Kandari AM. Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:207-214.
6. Kukreja RA. Should mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MiniPNL/Miniperc) be the ideal tract for medium-sized renal calculi (15–30 mm)? World Journal of Urology. 2018;36:285-291.
7. Feng D, Hu X, Tang Y, Han P, Wei X. The efficacy and safety of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2020; 61(2): 115-126.
8. Large T, Assmus MA, Valadon C, et al. A Multi-institutional Review of Single-access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Staghorn Stones. European Urology Focus. 2021/09/01/ 2021;7(5):1170-1175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.005
9. Güler A, Erbin A, Ucpinar B, Savun M, Sarilar O, Akbulut MF. Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large kidney stones: a randomized prospective study. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:289-295.
10. Zeng G, Cai C, Duan X, et al. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a noninferior modality to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 20–40 mm renal calculi: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. European Urology. 2021; 79(1):114-121.