Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 21/08/2021
Abstract Views: 986
Views PDF: 435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v504i2.931
Issue
Vol. 504 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Văn Quân, D. ., Thuỳ Dương, P. ., & Mạnh Hùng, N. . (2021). PROGRESSION AND SHORT TERM OUTCOMES OF MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN ADULTS IN VIET-DUC HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 504(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v504i2.931

PROGRESSION AND SHORT TERM OUTCOMES OF MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN ADULTS IN VIET-DUC HOSPITAL

Dương Văn Quân1, Phùng Thuỳ Dương1, Ngô Mạnh Hùng2,
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Vietnam-Germany Friendship Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Object: progression and short-term outcomes of mild traumatic brain injury in adults were studied. Patients and methods: prospective, descriptive study on nonoperative mild traumatic brain injury in adults in Viet-Duc hospital from May 2020 to December 2020. Glasgow outcome scale was used to evaluate treatment outcomes. Results: 306 cases met inclusion criteria. Mean age: 42.07±18; male (77.78%), female (22.22%). Traffic accident was seen in most patients. The mean number of CT scan was 1.93±0.4. There were 6 cases (1.96%) witnessed clinical deterioration. Good recovery with no disability accounted for 87.21% of all patients during the 3-month follow up. Mortality rate was 0.65%. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment has yielded positive results. Depending on patients's condition and specific circumstances, there will be different indications and treatment options.

Article Details

References

1. Rutland-Brown, W., et al., Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2006. 21(6): p. 544-8.
2. Đồng Văn Hệ, D.C.U., Đánh giá vai trò của CT-Scanner trong chấn thương sọ não nguy cơ thấp (Low-risk head injuries). Tạp chí nghiên cứu khoa học, 1997. 4(4): p. 9-13.
3. Đồng Văn Hệ, K.Đ.H., Chẩn đoán và điều trị chấn thương sọ não nguy cơ thấp. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2010. 371(1): p. 58-61.
4. Saatman, K.E., et al., Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma, 2008. 25(7): p. 719-38.
5. Lập, P.Đ., Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, hình ảnh chụp cắt lớp vi tính và đánh giá kết quả điều trị chấn thương sọ não nguy cơ thấp, in Luận văn thạc sỹ Y học. 2011, Đại Học Y Hà Nội: Việt Nam. p. 80.
6. McMillan, T., et al., The Glasgow Outcome Scale - 40 years of application and refinement. Nat Rev Neurol, 2016. 12(8): p. 477-85.
7. Tỵ, P., Chấn thương sọ não không có chỉ định phẫu thuật ở người trưởng thành. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 2010(2): p. 41-44.
8. Kreitzer, N., et al., Repeat neuroimaging of mild traumatic brain-injured patients with acute traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: clinical outcomes and radiographic features. Acad Emerg Med, 2014. 21(10): p. 1083-91.
9. Washington, C.W. and R.L. Grubb, Jr., Are routine repeat imaging and intensive care unit admission necessary in mild traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg, 2012. 116(3): p. 549-57.