PROGNOSIS OF UTERINE CONSERVATIVE SURGERY BASED ON ULTRASOUND IMAGES IN PLACENTA ACCRETA SURGERY

Thị Thu Hà Nguyễn, Tuấn Đạt Đỗ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the role of ultrasound signs and the ability to preserve the uterus in placenta accreta surgery. Subjects and methods: Retrospective descriptive study of 76 pregnant women diagnosed with placenta accreta and cesarean section scars treated at Hanoi Hospital. Results: 76 pregnant women participated in the study, there was no difference in the rate of each single ultrasound sign with the possibility of conservation or hysterectomy with p > 0.05. There is a statistically significant difference in the ability to preserve the uterus between the group with less than 2 signs on ultrasound and the group with 2 or more signs on ultrasound (p = 0.006 < 0.01, Se = 100% , Sp = 19%). There is a statistically significant difference in the hysterectomy rate between the group of pregnant women with 3 or more signs on ultrasound and the group with less than 3 signs on ultrasound (with p = 0.023 < 0.05, Se = 58 .8%, Sp = 66.7%, OR = 2.86), pregnant women with signs of blood vessels perpendicular to the uterine muscle had higher blood loss than the group without this sign with p = 0.047. Conclusions: There is no single ultrasound sign that decides whether to undergo a hysterectomy or preserve the uterus, but pregnant women with 3 signs on ultrasound have a high prognosis for hysterectomy during surgery.

Article Details

References

1. T. Eshkoli, A. Y. Weintraub, R. Sergienko et al (2013). Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 208 (3), 219.e211-217.
2. G. Garmi and R. Salim (2012). Epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and management of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol Int, 2012, 873929.
3. S. Wu, M. Kocherginsky andJ. U. Hibbard (2005). Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192 (5), 1458-1461.
4. R. Faranesh, S. Romano, E. Shalev et al (2007). Suggested approach for management of placenta percreta invading the urinary bladder. Obstet Gynecol, 110 (2 Pt 2), 512-515.
5. A. G. Eller, T. F. Porter, P. Soisson et al (2009). Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. Bjog, 116 (5), 648-654.
6. G. Daskalakis, E. Anastasakis, N. Papantoniou et al (2007). Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 86 (2), 223-227.
7. B. Poljak, D. Khairudin, N. Wyn Jones et al (2023). Placenta accreta spectrum: diagnosis and management. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 33 (8), 232-238.
8. H. E. Baumann, L. K. A. Pawlik, I. Hoesli et al (2023). Accuracy of ultrasound for the detection of placenta accreta spectrum in a universal screening population. 161 (3), 920-926.
9. T. K. Adu-Bredu, M. J. Rijken, A. J. Nieto-Calvache et al (2023). A simple guide to ultrasound screening for placenta accreta spectrum for improving detection and optimizing management in resource limited settings. 160 (3), 732-741.