MODELLED COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF AS-NEEDED BUDESONIDE/FORMOTEROL IN PATIENTS WITH MILD ASTHMA IN VIETNAM

Phạm Huy Tuấn Kiệt1, Lê Đặng Tú Nguyên2, Heleen van Haalen3, Trương Văn Đạt2, Lê Hồng Phương4, Nguyễn Thị Hải Yến2, Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Nga2,
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
3 AstraZeneca in Sweden
4 AstraZeneca vietnam Co., Ltd

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Cost-effectiveness analysis of Budesonide/Formoterol as needed compared with daily low dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with short-acting beta agonists as needed (SABA) in patients with mild asthma in Vietnam. Research methods: A probabilistic Markov cohort model was developed including three main states: non-exacerbation, severe exacerbation, and death. This study was carried out from the payer perspective, with a lifetime horizon and one-week cycle. Clinical parameters were derived from SYGMA 2 trial and costs were extracted from a cost-of-illness study in Vietnam and Drug Administration of Vietnam database. Results were expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), results of one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: On average, as needed Budesonide/Formoterol was associated with VND 2,632,464 cost savings, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains of 0.0006 and 0.44 exacerbations avoided versus ICS combined with as-needed SABA. Budesonide/Formoterol thus dominated the comparator regarding cost-effectiveness. The results of one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the basecase results. Conclusion: From the payer perspective, Budesonide/Formoterol as needed saved cost while increasing effectiveness relative to the low-dose ICS combined with as-needed SABA regime in Vietnam.

Article Details

References

1. Soriano JB, Kendrick PJ, Paulson KR, Gupta V, Abrams EM, Adedoyin RA, et al. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(6):585–96.
2. Trần Thúy Hạnh, Nguyễn Văn Đoàn, và cs. Dịch tễ học và tình hình kiểm soát hen phế quản ở người trưởng thành Việt Nam. Trung tâm đào tạo và chỉ đạo tuyến Bạch Mai. 2011.
3. Nguyễn Viết Nhung, Nguyễn Đình Duy, Võ Đức Chiến, Lê Thị Thu Hương, Vũ Văn Thành. Hiệu quả, an toàn của Budesonide/Formoterol (160/4,5µg) Turbuhaler khi cần trên bệnh nhân hen nhẹ (≥ 12 tuổi) ở Việt Nam: kết quả từ nghiên cứu SYGMA 1&2. Tạp chí Y học lâm sàng. 2020;118(1):101–8.
4. Bateman ED, Reddel HK, O’Byrne PM, Barnes PJ, Zhong N, Keen C, et al. As-Needed Budesonide–Formoterol versus Maintenance Budesonide in Mild Asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378 (20):1877–87.
5. Cục Quản lý Dược - Bộ Y tế. Dịch vụ công - Tra cứu giá thuốc. 2021.
6. Phạm Huy Tuấn Kiệt, Vũ Văn Giáp, Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hà. Chi phí y tế trực tiếp trong điều trị hen theo phân loại GINA dựa trên dữ liệu lớn từ Bảo hiểm y tế Việt Nam năm 2019. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021;503 (2):169–72.
7. FitzGerald JM, Arnetorp S, Smare C, Gibson D, Coulton K, Hounsell K, et al. The cost-effectiveness of as-needed budesonide/formoterol versus low-dose inhaled corticosteroid maintenance therapy in patients with mild asthma in the UK. Respir Med. 2020;171:106079.
8. Goossens LMA, Riemersma RA, Postma DS, Van Der Molen T, Rutten-Van Mölken MPMH. An economic evaluation of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever treatment in asthma in general practice. Adv Ther. 2009;26(9):872–85.