EVALUATION OF PI-RADS 2.1 WITH FOCAL LESIONS IN DIAGNOSIS PROSTATE CANCER AT NATIONAL CANCER HOSPITAL

Đặng Đình Phúc1,, Ngô Quốc Bộ1, Bùi Văn Giang1,2
1 Medical Imaging Center, K Hospital
2 Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to review the value of PI-RADS 2.1 on Magnetic Resoncance Imaging (MRI)  with focal lesions in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 10 patients who were detected focal prostate lesions by MRI and classified in terms of PI-RADS (PR) at the National Cancer Hospital  from August 2020 to July 2021. Systematic prostate lesion were biopsed by endorectal ultrasound guided, then compared with the histopathology findings. The positive predictive values of each PI-RADS category and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PI-RADS in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were calculated. Results: 10 patients have mean age is 68 years old, with urine delivery difficulties accounting about 60%, digial rectal examination found abnormal in 80% of patients. The men of total PSA level is of 35,48 ng/ml. In MRI imaging, the mean of prostate volume is 55g and the most common lesion located in the left transition zone of midprostate, accounting for 50%. The positive predictive values of each PI-RADS categories from PR1 to PR5 were 0%, 0%, 0%, 100% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PI-RADS when considering only the lesions classified as PR4 or PR5 were 100% respectively. Conclusion: PI-RADS on MRI showed both very high specificity and sensitivity for focal lesions in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Article Details

References

1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87-108. doi:10.3322/caac.21262
2. Van Dong H, Lee AH, Nga NH, Quang N, Le Chuyen V, Binns CW. Epidemiology and prevention of prostate cancer in Vietnam. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(22):9747-9751. doi:10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.22.9747
3. Murphy G, Haider M, Ghai S, Sreeharsha B. The expanding role of MRI in prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(6):1229-1238. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10178
4. Ahmed HU, Kirkham A, Arya M, et al. Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6(4):197-206. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.18
5. Tamada T, Sone T, Higashi H, et al. Prostate cancer detection in patients with total serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL: diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and T2-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):664-670. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5923
6. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):746-757.doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
7. Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol. 2016;69(1):16-40. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052
8. Vũ Lê Chuyên, Đỗ Anh Toàn. Khảo sát tỷ lệ ung thư tuyến tiền liệt ở nam giới trên 50 tuổi đến khám tại bệnh viện Bình Dân. Y Học TP Hồ Chí Minh. 2012;16:335-341.
9. Vũ Trung Kiên, Đỗ Trường Thành, Nguyễn Lan Hương. Đánh giá kết quả sinh thiết tuyến tiền liệt 12 mẫu trong chẩn đoán sớm ung thư tuyến tiền liệt. Tạp chí Y dược học - Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế. 2017;Số đặc biệt tháng 8/2017:297-303.
10. Trịnh Lê Hồng Minh. Giá trị của cộng hưởng từ khuếch tán trong chẩn đoán ung thư biểu mô tuyến tiền liệt. Published online 2014.