Article Sidebar
Date Published:
11/09/2021
Abstract Views: 142
Views PDF: 109
Views PDF: 109
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Xuan Khoa, N. ., Le Dinh Duy, T. ., Sinh Vuong, T. ., Van Hoat, N. ., Van Hong, H. ., & Thai Ha Duong, N. . (2021). RESEARCH ON ACETABULAR PARAMETERS, FEMORAL AND COMBINED ANTEVERSION ANGLES ON COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCAN. Vietnam Medical Journal, 506(1-2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v506i1-2.980
RESEARCH ON ACETABULAR PARAMETERS, FEMORAL AND COMBINED ANTEVERSION ANGLES ON COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
54 computed-tomography scans of 54 Vietnamese adults with at least 1 non-pathological hip at Hanoi Medical University Hospital are used on our research. The results are: Acetabular inclination angle: 37.48 ± 4.95o; Acetabular anteversion angle: 17.2 ± 5.81o; Femoral anteversion angle: 12.03 ± 7.32o; Combined anteversion: 29.23 ± 9.07o.
Article Details
Keywords
Acetabulum, femoral anteversion, combined anteversion
References
1. Dimitriou.D., Tsai.T.-Y., Yue.B., et al. (2016). Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 102(1), p. 91-97.
2. Boissonneault.A.R., Hiranaka.T., Roberson.J.R., et al. (2017). A Validated Single-View Radiographic Alternative to Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Femoral Anteversion: A Method-Comparison Study. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(3), p. 1018-1023.
3. Sugano,N.,btv. (2018), Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery for Hip and Knee, Springer Singapore, Singapore.
4. Tran Trung.D., Pham Trung.H., Truong Cong.M., et al. (2019). The anatomical characteristics of Vietnamese adult hip joint: a multiplanar reconstruction computer tomographic study. Muscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 09(01), p. 165.
5. Maheshwari.A. V., Zlowodzki.M.P., Siram.G., et al. (2010). Femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in the normal Indian adult population: A computed tomographic study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 44(3), p. 277-282.
6. Jiang.N., Peng.L., Al-Qwbani.M., et al. (2015). Femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion in Chinese Han population: a retrospective analysis of 466 healthy adults. Medicine, 94(21), p. e891.
7. Gilligan.I., Chandraphak.S., and Mahakkanukrauh.P. (2013). Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: Variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side. Journal of Anatomy, 223(2), p. 133-151.
8. Buller.L.T., Rosneck.J., Monaco.F.M., et al. (2012). Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(2), p. 367-375.
9. Reikeråls.O., Bjerkreim.I., and Kolbenstvedt.A. (1983). Anteversion of the Acetabulum and Femoral Neck in Normals and in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Hip. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 54(1), p. 18-23.
2. Boissonneault.A.R., Hiranaka.T., Roberson.J.R., et al. (2017). A Validated Single-View Radiographic Alternative to Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Femoral Anteversion: A Method-Comparison Study. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(3), p. 1018-1023.
3. Sugano,N.,btv. (2018), Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery for Hip and Knee, Springer Singapore, Singapore.
4. Tran Trung.D., Pham Trung.H., Truong Cong.M., et al. (2019). The anatomical characteristics of Vietnamese adult hip joint: a multiplanar reconstruction computer tomographic study. Muscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 09(01), p. 165.
5. Maheshwari.A. V., Zlowodzki.M.P., Siram.G., et al. (2010). Femoral neck anteversion, acetabular anteversion and combined anteversion in the normal Indian adult population: A computed tomographic study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 44(3), p. 277-282.
6. Jiang.N., Peng.L., Al-Qwbani.M., et al. (2015). Femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion in Chinese Han population: a retrospective analysis of 466 healthy adults. Medicine, 94(21), p. e891.
7. Gilligan.I., Chandraphak.S., and Mahakkanukrauh.P. (2013). Femoral neck-shaft angle in humans: Variation relating to climate, clothing, lifestyle, sex, age and side. Journal of Anatomy, 223(2), p. 133-151.
8. Buller.L.T., Rosneck.J., Monaco.F.M., et al. (2012). Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(2), p. 367-375.
9. Reikeråls.O., Bjerkreim.I., and Kolbenstvedt.A. (1983). Anteversion of the Acetabulum and Femoral Neck in Normals and in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Hip. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 54(1), p. 18-23.