SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF LOCKING PLATE FIXTATION IN THE TREATMENT OF CLOSED PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES AT THAI NGUYEN NATIONAL HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Proximal humeral fractures are the most common type of humeral fractures. Surgical fixation with locking plate has been widely applied in many hospitals with good outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the results of surgical fixation using locking plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures at Thai Nguyen National Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A descriptive study of 57 patients who underwent surgical fixation with locking plate for proximal humeral fractures at Thai Nguyen National Hospital from January 2020 to March 2025. Results: Male patients accounted for 31.6%, and female patients accounted for 68.4%. The mean age was 55.4 ± 17.0 years, with patients aged 40–60 making up 45.6%. Farmers accounted for 26.3%, and traffic accidents and daily activity injuries were the leading causes, at 50.9% and 45.6% respectively. Osteoporosis was present in 56.1% of patients. According to Neer’s classification, type III fractures accounted for 35.1%. Preoperative radiographs showed that fractures with displacement between 30°–60° accounted for 71.9%, and >60° for 28.1%. Postoperative anatomical reduction was achieved in 87.7% of patients.The overall rate of good and excellent outcomes was 84.2%, while 15.8% had fair or poor results.The mean VAS pain score was 2.5 ± 2.2. The mean Constant-Murley score for shoulder joint function was 29.8 ± 2.5, with pain 22.3 ± 2.5, activities of daily living 8.6 ± 0.7. Excellent outcomes were achieved in 52.6% of patients, good in 45.6%, fair in 1.8%, and no patients had poor results. Conclusion: Surgical fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking plate is an appropriate treatment method that provides high effectiveness.
Article Details
Keywords
Proximal humeral fracture, locking plate fixation, humerus fracture.
References
2. Maier, D., M. Jaeger, K. Izadpanah, P.C. Strohm, & N.P. Suedkamp. Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults. JBJS96, 251-261.(2014)
3. Tuấn, P.A. Kết quả phẫu thuật kết hợp xương bằng nẹp vít điều trị gãy kín đầu trên xương cánh tay tại Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Đức. Luận văn tốt nghiệp bác sĩ nội trú.(2020)
4. Vương, N.Đ. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm tổn thương giải phẫu và kết quả điều trị gãy đầu trên xương cánh tay bằng nẹp khóa.Luận án tiến sĩ y học, Học viện Quân y.(2021)
5. Anh, Đ.N. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị gãy kín đầu trên xương cánh tay ở người lớn băng nẹp vít khóa tại bệnh viện hữu nghị Việt Tiệp.Luận văn thạc sĩ y học.(2018)
6. Fallatah, S., G.F. Dervin, J.A. Brunet, A.F. Conway, &H. Hrushowy. Functional outcome after proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty.Canadian Journal of Surgery51, 361.(2008)
7. Anshuman, K.& P. Gourishankar. A comparative study of closed reduction and fixation with percutaneous k-wires versus open reduction and internal fixation with philos plate for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.International Journal of Orthopaedics4, 398-407.(2018)