THE ASSOCIATION OF FRAILTY WITH IN-HOSPITAL BLEEDING AMONG OLDER ADULTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AT THONG NHAT HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between frailty and in-hospital bleeding events among older adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at Thong Nhat hospital. Subjects and Methods: A prospective short-term cohort study enrolled patients aged ≥60 years undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at the Department of Emergent and Interventional Cardiology, Thong Nhat Hospital, from August 2024 to August 2025. Frailty status was evaluated using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), while in-hospital bleeding events were categorized according to the BARC classification. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS software, version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results: Among 305 patients enrolled between August 2024 and August 2025 at the Department of Emergent and Interventional Cardiology, Thong Nhat Hospital, the incidence of in-hospital bleeding was 16.1%. Frailty (CFS ≥4) and periprocedural UFH dose (IU/kg) were significantly associated with bleeding events. Frailty was independently associated with in-hospital bleeding (OR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.06–4.95; p = 0.035). Stratified analysis demonstrated that both very mild/mild frailty (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.00–4.56; p = 0.049) and moderate-to-severe frailty (OR: 7.27; 95% CI: 2.38–22.27; p < 0.001) were independent predictors compared with non-frail patients. The incidence of bleeding increased progressively with frailty severity (fit/well: 9.1%; very mild/mild: 17.6%; moderate/severe: 42.1%). Additionally, higher periprocedural UFH dose was an independent predictor of in-hospital bleeding (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02–1.07; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Frailty independently predicts in-hospital bleeding after PCI in older adults, emphasizing the necessity of frailty assessment to guide individualized anticoagulation strategies and improve procedural safety.
Article Details
Keywords
Frailty, bleeding, percutaneous coronary intervention, elderly patients.
References
2. Chhatriwalla AK, Amin AP, Kennedy KF, et al. Association Between Bleeding Events and In-hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JAMA 2013;309(10):1022.
3. Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Levine MN. Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant and Thrombolytic Treatment. Chest 2008;133(6): 257S-298S.
4. Wang S-S, Liu W-H. Impact of frailty on outcomes of elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2024;12(1):107–18.
5. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 2011;123(23):2736–47.
6. Rockwood K, Theou O. Using the Clinical Frailty Scale in Allocating Scarce Health Care Resources. Can Geri J 2020;23(3):254–9.
7. Dodson JA, Hochman JS, Roe MT, et al. The Association of Frailty With In-Hospital Bleeding Among Older Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2018;11(22):2287–96.
8. Schulz S, Mehilli J, Neumann F-J, et al. ISAR-REACT 3A: a study of reduced dose of unfractionated heparin in biomarker negative patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. European Heart Journal 2010; 31(20):2482–91.
9. Melloni C, Alexander KP, Chen AY, et al. Unfractionated heparin dosing and risk of major bleeding in non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. American Heart Journal 2008;156(2):209–15.