OUTCOMES OF HIGH-FLOW NASAL CANNULA (HFNC) OXYGEN THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CRITICALLY RESPIRATORY FAILURE DUE TO COVID-19 AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR TROPICAL DISEASES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients with critical respiratory failure. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on critically respiratory failure COVID-19 patients treated with HFNC in the Intensive Care Unit of the National Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Vietnam, from May 2021 to April 2023. Results: There were 147 critically ill COVID-19 patients on HFNC treatment screened during the study period. Of which, 118 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included. The mean age was 63.8 ± 19.6; 72% were male, and 69.5% had comorbidities. HFNC was successful in 65 patients (55.1%), while 53 patients (44.9%) failed HFNC requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. The median (IQR) HFNC duration in succeful group and failure group was 120 (80–173) hours and 30 (10–79) hours, respectively. Most HFNC failed patients occurred within the first 48 hours (31 patients, 59.5%), especially within the first 6 hours (10 patients accounted for 18.9% of the HFNC failures). In univariable analyses, risk factors for HFNC failure included female, ROX index < 4.88 and heart rate > 100 beats/min while on HFNC, absolute lymphocyte count ≤ 0.50 × 10^9/L, increased FiO₂ requirement after 2 hours on HFNC, and having complications during HFNC period. In multivariable analysis, only absolute lymphocyte count ≤ 0.50 × 10^9/L and complications during HFNC were independent risk factors associated with increased failure, with adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of 2.92 (1.21–7.03) and 3.86 (1.57–9.47), respectively. Conclusions: HFNC is an effective therapy in treatment of COVID-19 patients with critically respiratory failure, more than a half of patients excluded from invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the failure rate was still high with most failures occurred within the first 48 hours on HFNC.
Article Details
Keywords
COVID-19; high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC).
References
2. Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, et al. (2019). High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med;45(5):563-572. doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5
3. Panadero C, Abad-Fernández A, Rio-Ramirez MT, et al. (2020). High-flow nasal cannula for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. Multidiscip Respir Med;15(1):693. doi:10.4081/mrm.2020.693
4. Frat JP, Quenot JP, Badie J, et al. (2022). Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen vs Standard Oxygen Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: The SOHO-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA.;328(12):1212-1222. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.15613
5. Chandel A, Patolia S, Brown AW, et al. (2021). High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in COVID-19: Using the ROX Index to Predict Success. Respir Care; 66(6):909-919. doi:10. 4187/respcare.08631
6. Calle-Peña ST, Diaz Tavara ED, Aguirre-Milachay E, et al. (2024). Predictors of high-flow nasal cannula failure in COVID-19 patients in a northern Peruvian hospital. BMC Pulmonary Medicine; 24(1):414. doi:10.1186/s12890-024-03241-0
7. Paules CI, Nordwall JA, Shaw-Saliba K, et al. (2025). Blood absolute lymphocyte count and trajectory are important in understanding severe COVID-19. BMC Infectious Diseases; 25(1):67. doi:10.1186/s12879-024-10428-7
8. Katsoularis I, Fonseca-Rodríguez O, Farrington P, et al. (2021). Risk of acute myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke following COVID-19 in Sweden: a self-controlled case series and matched cohort study. Lancet; 398(10300): 599-607. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00896-5