EVALUATION OF PAIN RELIEF OUTCOMES USING SELECTIVE NERVE ROOT BLOCK IN LUMBAR RADICULOPATHY
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
Background: Lumbar selective nerve root block (SNRB) is a routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure at 1A Hospital for managing chronic low back pain and radiculopathy. The procedure aims to alleviate pain by injecting a local anesthetic and/or corticosteroid around the symptomatic nerve root. Despite its global application, clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of lumbar SNRB within the Vietnamese population remains limited. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 98 patients to evaluate the efficacy of lumbar SNRB. Treatment outcomes were assessed based on pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale - VAS), functional improvement (MacNab criteria), and the total duration of pain relief. Results: A significant improvement in mean VAS leg pain scores was observed, decreasing from $8.2 \pm 1.73$ at baseline to $2.08 \pm 2.02$ post-procedure in 88 cases. At the 6-month follow-up, the mean VAS score remained significantly lower than baseline at $3.56 \pm 2.93$ ($p < 0.01$). Recurrence of leg pain was reported within 1–2 weeks in 10.2% of cases (10/98); these patients subsequently underwent surgical intervention. The duration of effective pain relief ranged from one week to six months. Conclusion: These findings suggest that lumbar SNRB is an effective intervention for chronic low back pain and radiculopathy, providing significant pain reduction and functional recovery while potentially delaying the need for surgery in specific cases. However, further prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these results. Overall, lumbar SNRB represents a viable nonsurgical option for appropriately selected patients.
Từ khóa
Selective nerve root block; Lumbar radiculopathy; Chronic low back pain; Pain relief; Lumbar disc herniation
Chi tiết bài viết
Tài liệu tham khảo
2. Anwar A, Zaidah I, & Rozita, R. (2005). Prospective randomised single blind study of epidural steroid injection comparing triamcinalone acetonide with methylprednisolone acetate. APLAR Journal of Rheumatology, 8(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8077.2005.00115.x
3. de Souza Grava AL, Ferrari LF, Defino HL. Cytokine inhibition and time-related influence of inflammatory stimuli on the hyperalgesia induced by the nucleus pulposus. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(3):537-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2027-8
4. Franson RC, Saal JS, Saal JA. Human disc phospholipase A2 is inflammatory. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17(6 Suppl):S129-S132. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199206001-00011
5. Kanna RM, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S. Predictors of Successful Outcomes of Selective Nerve Root Blocks for Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation. Global Spine J. 2019;9(5):473-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218800050
6. Kang SS, Hwang BM, Son HJ, et al. The dosages of corticosteroid in transforaminal epidural steroid injections for lumbar radicular pain due to a herniated disc. Pain Physician. 2011;14(4):361-370. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21785479/
7. Kingsbury D. Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection-Supraneural, Two-Needle Technique: Fluoroscopic Guidance. In: Atlas of Image-Guided Spinal Procedures. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018:217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-40153-1.00022-6
8. Lee HM, Weinstein JN, Meller ST, Hayashi N, Spratt KF, Gebhart GF. The role of steroids and their effects on phospholipase A2. An animal model of radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(11):1191-1196. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199806010-00001