COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF ANA-ELISA AND ANA IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE IN CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Comparison of the diagnostic value of antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing using ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) techniques in autoimmune diseases. Materials and methods: The study was conducted from October to December 2022. Sera from 59 patients with autoimmune diseases and 34 healthy controls were tested for ANA using ELISA (ANA-ELISA) and indirect immunofluorescence (ANA-IIF) techniques. Results: Among the 62 serum samples with ANA-IIF (+), the most common staining pattern was speckle (53.23%). The sensitivities of ANA-IIF and ANA-ELISA for autoimmune diseases were 97.22% and 91.76%, respectively, and for SLE were 88.14% and 86.44%, respectively. The specificity of ANA-ELISA for autoimmune diseases is 88.24%, higher than ANA-IIF at 70.59%. The false positive rate of ANA-IIF in the control group was 17.65% compared to 0% of ANA-ELISA. Conclusions: ANA-ELISA has lower sensitivity but higher specificity than ANA-IIF in screening and diagnosing autoimmune diseases.
Article Details
Keywords
antinuclear antibody, ELISA, indirect immunofluorescence.
References

2. Neveen A. Kamel, Ashraf A. Hassaballa, Yomna M. Hasan. Detection of antinuclear antibody in autoimmune connectivetissue diseases: a comparison between immunofluorescence and solid-phase assay. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 16:223–228

3. Alsaed OS, Alamlih LI, Al-Radideh O, Chandra P, Alemadi S, Al-Allaf AW. Clinical utility of ANA-ELISA vs ANA-immunofluorescence in connective tissue diseases. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8229.

4. El-Chennawi FA, Mosaad YM, Habib HM, El-Degheidi T. Comparative study of antinuclear antibody detection by indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme immunoassay in lupus patients. Immunol Invest. 2009;38(8):839-50.

5. Tayde A, Agrawal C, A. T. Deshmukh. Comparison of immunofluorescence assay (IF) with ELISA in detection of antinuclear antibodies. Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology, 2018;5(3):418-420.
