APPLICATION OF INTRACORONARY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY (OCT) TO GUIDE OPTIMAL INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY ARTERY INTERVENTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the feasibility, safety, and role of intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) for optimal guidance in coronary artery intervention patients. Subjects and methods: Twenty-five patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease and indicated for coronary intervention, inpatient treatment at the Department of Cardiology, Tam Anh Hospital, from April 2022 to October 2023. Intravascular images were analyzed before and after intervention using coronary optical computed tomography (OCT). Results: The average age is 49.12 ± 9.07 years; males account for 68%. The technique is safe, with no complications such as major cardiovascular events (MACE) during the hospital stay. OCT plays a role in guiding intervention optimization through high achievement criteria, in which the smallest lumen area in the stent lumen is 5.79 ± 1.11 mm2; Stent expansion rate achieved 85.89±17.25%; 92% met the criteria of no stent edge separation; 88% met the criteria of 88% vessel wall pressure; 96% met the lesion coverage criteria; 80% met the criteria for parenchymal stent failure. The proportion of patients meeting all criteria for optimal stent outcomes is 68%; calcified lesions increase the risk of difficulty achieving optimal results with odds ratio OR=16.80 (95% CI: 1,62-174.52, p<0.05). Conclusion: Intravascular optical tomography is a safe and feasible technique to evaluate coronary artery lesions with highly optimized results.
Article Details
Keywords
Optical coherence tomography, myocardial infarction, coronary artery.
References
Vaduganathan M, Mensah GA, Turco JV, Fuster V, Roth GA. The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022;80(25): 2361-2371. doi:doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.005.
2. Nagaraja V, Kalra A, Puri R. When to use intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention? Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10(5):1429-1444. doi:10.21037/cdt-20-206.
3. Phạm Mạnh Hùng. Các thăm dò xâm lấn đánh giá giả phẫu và sinh lý động mạch vành: IVUS, OCT, FFR. Tim Mạch Can Thiệp.Tập 1. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2022.
4. Trần Minh Trung, Nguyễn Trung Kiên, Huỳnh Trung Cang. Nghiên cứu hình thái tổn thương động mạch vành gây hẹp có ý nghĩa bằng chụp cắt lớp kết quang (OCT) trước can thiệp động mạch tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa Kiên Giang. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2023(60):192-198.
5. Meneveau N, Souteyrand G, Motreff P, et al. Optical coherence tomography to optimize results of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: results of the multicenter, randomized DOCTORS study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting). Circulation. 2016;134(13):906-917.
6. Chamié D, Costa Jr JR, Damiani LP, et al. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and angiography to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: the iSIGHT randomized trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;14(3):e009452.
7. Antonsen L, Thayssen P, Maehara A, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Nobori Stent Implantation in Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction (OCTACS) Trial: Difference in Strut Coverage and Dynamic Malapposition Patterns at 6 Months. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015; 8(8):e002446.
8. Habara M, Nasu K, Terashima M, et al. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;5(2):193-201.
9. Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, et al. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(42):3139-3147.
10. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2618-2628
2. Nagaraja V, Kalra A, Puri R. When to use intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography during percutaneous coronary intervention? Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10(5):1429-1444. doi:10.21037/cdt-20-206.
3. Phạm Mạnh Hùng. Các thăm dò xâm lấn đánh giá giả phẫu và sinh lý động mạch vành: IVUS, OCT, FFR. Tim Mạch Can Thiệp.Tập 1. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2022.
4. Trần Minh Trung, Nguyễn Trung Kiên, Huỳnh Trung Cang. Nghiên cứu hình thái tổn thương động mạch vành gây hẹp có ý nghĩa bằng chụp cắt lớp kết quang (OCT) trước can thiệp động mạch tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa Kiên Giang. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2023(60):192-198.
5. Meneveau N, Souteyrand G, Motreff P, et al. Optical coherence tomography to optimize results of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: results of the multicenter, randomized DOCTORS study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting). Circulation. 2016;134(13):906-917.
6. Chamié D, Costa Jr JR, Damiani LP, et al. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and angiography to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: the iSIGHT randomized trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;14(3):e009452.
7. Antonsen L, Thayssen P, Maehara A, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Nobori Stent Implantation in Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction (OCTACS) Trial: Difference in Strut Coverage and Dynamic Malapposition Patterns at 6 Months. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015; 8(8):e002446.
8. Habara M, Nasu K, Terashima M, et al. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012;5(2):193-201.
9. Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, et al. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. European Heart Journal. 2017;38(42):3139-3147.
10. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2618-2628