Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 26/08/2021
Abstract Views: 432
Views PDF: 277
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v505i2.1116
Issue
Vol. 505 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Văn Minh, Đỗ . (2021). VALUATION OF THE RESPONSE TO REPEATED NERVE STIMULATION TEST IN PATIENTS WITH OCULAR MYASTHENIA GRAVIS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 505(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v505i2.1116

VALUATION OF THE RESPONSE TO REPEATED NERVE STIMULATION TEST IN PATIENTS WITH OCULAR MYASTHENIA GRAVIS

Đỗ Văn Minh1,2,
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Hanoi Medical University Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the patient comprehension and satisfaction in informed consent for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Materials and method: A total 86 patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to ask to complete a detailed questionnairethat designed to evaluate the patient comprehension and satisfaction of the informed consent process prior to the operating room in Hanoi Medical University Hospital from June 2019 to December 2020. Results: Doctors provided more information aboutmain diagnosis, anatomical injuries in the knee joint, reason for surgery, doctor’s interventions, major complications than information about post- operative feeling, pain and paincontrol, time off work, chances of successful surgery and precautions in daily activities. Almost patients felt normal with informed consent process. Conclusion: The informed consent process for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction should be done more effectively to make patientan informed decision to surgery and satisfy with its process.

Article Details

Keywords

informed consent, knee arthroscopy, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Hanoi Medical University Hospital

References

1. Hallock J.L., Rios R., and Handa V.L. (2017). Patient satisfaction and informed consent for surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 217(2), 181.e1-181.e7.
2. Cocanour C.S. (2017). Informed consent—It’s more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg, 214(6), 993–997.
3. McGaughey I. (2004). Informed consent and knee arthroscopies: an evaluation of patient understanding and satisfaction. The Knee, 11(3), 237–242.
4. Chapter 2: opinions on consent, communication & decision making. In: American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics; 2016:1e2. https://www. ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ama-code-medical-ethics. Accessed April 13, 2017.
5. Hutson M.M. and Blaha J.D. (1991). Patients’ recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 73(2), 160–162.
6. Rossi M.J., Guttmann D., MacLennan M.J., et al. (2005). Video Informed Consent Improves Knee Arthroscopy Patient Comprehension. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg, 21(6), 739–743.
7. Yin B., Goldsmith L., and Gambardella R. (2015). Web-Based Education Prior to Knee Arthroscopy Enhances Informed Consent and Patient Knowledge Recall: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. J Bone Jt Surg, 97(12), 964–971.
8. Cornoiu A., Beischer A.D., Donnan L., et al. (2011). Multimedia patient education to assist the informed consent process for knee arthroscopy: Multimedia patient education for surgery. ANZ J Surg, 81(3), 176–180.