DISTRIBUTION AND ANTIMICOBIAL RESISTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF ENTEROBACTER SPP. ISOLATED FROM BAC NINH PROVINCIAL GENERAL HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Study the distribution and antimicrobial-resistant characteristics of Enterobacter spp. isolated from Bac Ninh Provincial General Hospital in the period from 2019 to 2022. Subject and methods: This was a descriptive study. The subject of the study was Enterobacter spp. strains isolated from Bac Ninh Provincial General Hospital in the period between 2019 and 2022. Results: Out of a total of 74 strains of Enterobacter spp. isolated during the research period from 2019 to 2022, the number of isolates from men accounted for 60.8%, which is 1,5 times higher than the rate from women (39.2%). Respiratory fluid specimens had the highest rate of isolation of Enterobacter (41.9%). The proportion of Enterobacter isolated from wound, urine, and blood was 33.8%, 13.5%, and 10.8%, respectively. The percentage of Enterobacter spp. isolated from the respiratory medicine department was the highest, at 24.3%, followed by the trauma surgery department (16.2%). The rate of Enterobacter spp. isolated from the dermatology department and cardiovascular center was the lowest, at 1.4%. Enterobacter was the most resistant to cefuroxime (66.2%), followed by ceftriaxone (55.2%) and cefotaxime (53.6%). In contrast, Enterobacterspp. was the most sensitive to amikacin (70,3%), followed by imipenem (64.7%), chloramphenicol (64.2%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (60,0%). Conclusion: The study showed that Enterobacter spp. mainly causes respiratory infections, wound infections, and urinary tract infections. Enterobacter spp. was the most resistant to cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime. These bacteria were the most sensitive to amikacin, imipenem, and chloramphenicol.
Article Details
Keywords
Enterbacter spp., antibiotic resistance, bacteria
References
2. Amy L. Leber, Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. 2016: ASM Press.
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 33rd ed. CLSI supplement M100 (2023).
4. Jari Intra, et al., (2023), Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella aerogenes Strains Isolated from Clinical Specimens: A Twenty-Year Surveillance Study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Apr; 12(4): 775.
5. Malekzadegan, et al., (2017), Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern and Frequency of Multiple-Drug Resistant Enterobacter Spp. at A Tertiary Care Hospital in Southwest of Iran. Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (JKIMSU), 2017, Vol 6, Issue 2, p33.
6. Phạm Thị Vân, và cs (2023), Tính kháng kháng sinh của các chủn vi khuẩn Enterbacteriaceae phân lập tại bệnh viện E (2018 – 2020). Truyền nhiễm Việt Nam, Số 01 (41) 2023, tr 67 – 73.
7. Zeinab Mohseni Afsha, et al., (2021), The Prevalence and Pattern of Enterobacter Antibiotic Resistance in the Patients Admitted to Imam Reza Hospital in Kermanshah, Iran (2016 - 2018). Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Vol. 25, Issue 1, Mar 2021.
8. Sang-Ho Choi, et al., (2008), Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance during Therapy for Infections Caused by Enterobacteriaceae Producing AmpC β-Lactamase: Implications for Antibiotic Use. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Volume 52, Number 3, March 2008.