Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 17/10/2024
Abstract Views: 0
Views pdf: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v543i2.11446
Issue
Vol. 543 No. 2 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hoàng, P. K., Nguyễn, T. T. H., & Lê, V. T. (2024). SURVEYING PHASE ANGLE BY BIOIMPEDANCE ANALYSIS ON MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 543(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v543i2.11446

SURVEYING PHASE ANGLE BY BIOIMPEDANCE ANALYSIS ON MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Phúc Khăm Hoàng, Thị Thu Hà Nguyễn, Việt Thắng Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the phase angle (PhA) by Bioimpedance analysis and its relations with some clinical and paraclinical indicators on maintenance hemodialysis patients. Subjects and methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive study on 104 maintenance hemodialysis patients and 35 healthy controls matched for age and gender at Military Hospital 103 from September, 2023 to June 2024. All above patients were measured phase angle by Bioimpedance analysis Inbody S10. Results: The phase angle in the group of patients on maintenance hemodialysis 5.260 ± 0.920 was lower than the control group 7.250 ± 1.050, p< 0.001. 43.3% of patients had reduced phase angle compared to the control group, no patient had increased PhA. Phase angle is negatively correlated with age (r=-0.342, p<0.001), positively correlated with serum albumin (r=0.176, p=0.037), hemoglobin (r=0.238, p=0.015), serum creatinine (r=0.313, p=0.001). Conclusion: Phase angle decreased in maintenance hemodialysis patients. PhA is negatively correlated with age, positively correlated with serum albumin, hemoglobin and creatinine.

Article Details

Keywords

Phase angle (PhA), maintenance hemodialysis, bioimpedance analysis.

References

1. Mulasi U., Kuchnia A.J., Cole A.J., et al. (2015). Bioimpedance at the Bedside. Nutr Clin Pract, 30(2), 180–193.
2. Ayala M., Marchant M., Hertz C., et al. (2022). Intradialytic nutrition and quality of life in Chilean older patients in hemodialysis with protein-energy wasting. Int Urol Nephrol, 54(8), 1947–1955.
3. Norman K., Stobäus N., Pirlich M., et al. (2012). Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis – Clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. Clin Nutr, 31(6), 854–861.
4. Lukaski H.C., Kyle U.G., and Kondrup J. (2017). Assessment of adult malnutrition and prognosis with bioelectrical impedance analysis: phase angle and impedance ratio. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 20(5), 330.
5. Saitoh M., Ogawa M., Kondo H., et al. (2020). Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle as a determinant of protein-energy wasting and frailty in maintenance hemodialysis patients: retrospective cohort study. BMC Nephrol, 21(1), 438.
6. Shin J., Kim C.R., Park K.H., et al. (2017). Predicting clinical outcomes using phase angle as assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Nutrition, 41, 7–13.
7. Rovin B.H., Adler S.G., Barratt J., et al. (2021). KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int, 100(4), S1–S276.
8. Tan T., Liang D., Liu Y., et al. (2018). Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis–Derived Phase Angle Predicts Protein–Energy Wasting in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. J Ren Nutr, 29.
9. Kim D.H. and Oh D.-J. (2021). Phase angle values, a good indicator of nutritional status, are associated with median value of hemoglobin rather than hemoglobin variability in hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail, 43(1), 327–334.
10. Bae E., Lee T.W., Bae W., et al. (2022). Impact of phase angle and sarcopenia estimated by bioimpedance analysis on clinical prognosis in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 101(25), e29375.