DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FEATURES OF RECTOCELE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN WOMEN

Minh Lý Lê, Ngọc Ánh Nguyễn, Văn Huy Nguyễn, Trung Vinh Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Rectocele is a common condition in women, which often presents with symptoms such as bowel and urinary dysfunction, significantly affecting quality of life. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable tool for diagnosing rectocele and assessing related factors. Our study aimed to describe dynamic MRI characteristics in female with rectocele at Trieu An Hospital from May 2016 to June 2024. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 123 female patients with pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms, who underwent dynamic MRI at Trieu An Hospital from May 2016 to June 2024. Results: Rectocele was identified in 85 out of 123 patients (69.1%), with an average prolapse size of 2.2 cm (0.6–4.7 cm) and an average neck size of 2.8 cm (0.3–6 cm). Grade 2 rectocele was the most common (34.1%), followed by grade 1 (28.5%) and grade 3 (6.5%). According to the Marti classification, Marti I (finger-like shape) accounted for 26.8%, Marti II (round pouch) for 22.8%, and Marti III (rectocele with intussusception) for 19.5%. Women who had given birth had a 4.7 times higher risk of developing rectocele, and those with defecation disorders had a 4.2 times higher risk compared to those without. Additionally, posterior compartment prolapse, uterine prolapse, and bladder prolapse were significantly associated with rectocele (P<0.01). Conclusion: Dynamic pelvic MRI provides a comprehensive and accurate assessment of rectocele and its associated risk factors. Utilizing this imaging technique enhances the ability to develop tailored treatment approaches for women with pelvic floor dysfunction, improving clinical outcomes

Article Details

References

1. Kobi M, Flusberg M, Paroder V, Chernyak VJJoMRI. Practical guide to dynamic pelvic floor MRI. 2018;47(5):1155-1170.
2. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker LJIUJ. The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. 1999;10:96-99.
3. Brown RA, Ellis CNJCic, surgery r. The role of synthetic and biologic materials in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. 2014;27(04):182-190.
4. RICHARDSON ACJCo, gynecology. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. 1993;36(4):976-983.
5. Đức VTJTcĐq, Nam YhhnV. Đánh giá đặc điểm sa trực tràng kiểu túi ở bệnh nhân rối loạn chức năng sàn chậu bằng cộng hưởng từ động. 2014;(15):19-25.
6. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EAJR. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. 1991;179(1):25-33.
7. Kudish BI, Iglesia CB, Sokol RJ, et al. Effect of weight change on natural history of pelvic organ prolapse. 2009;113(1):81-88.
8. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, Watson S, Phillips R, Armstrong PJR. Patterns of prolapse in women with symptoms of pelvic floor weakness: assessment with MR imaging. 1997;203(1):77-81.