EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY OF THE VIETNAMESE VERSION OF THE FALL-PREVENTION ACTIVITIES SCALE IN ASSESSING NURSES' FALL-PREVENTION PRACTICES

Thị Khuyên Võ , Thị Hà Đỗ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Falls are medical incidents that have many negative impacts on patients. Fall prevention is important for improving the quality of care and treatment. The Fall-Prevention Activities (FPA) scale is used in many countries worldwide to assess hospital nurses' fall-prevention practices. However, the nursing care environment in each location has its unique characteristics. Objective: To translate and determine the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of the FPA scale. Research Method: The FPA scale was translated into Vietnamese following a forward and backward translation process. The Vietnamese version was sent to a panel of experts to assess content validity compared to the original version, resulting in a complete Vietnamese version of the scale. The Vietnamese version (FPA-V) was then used to survey fall-prevention practices among 30 nurses to evaluate the reliability and suitability of the scale before conducting the official survey. Results: The Vietnamese version of the FPA scale has content validity similar to the original version. However, some items were adjusted to fit the context of Vietnamese nursing care. The scale consists of 20 questions. The scale's validity after adjustments had an I-CVI of 1, an S-CVI of 1, and an S-CVI/UA of 1. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.935. Nurses took about 10 minutes to complete the survey. 100% of the research participants evaluated the questionnaire as suitable for assessing nurses' practices in fall prevention for patients in Vietnam. Conclusion: The scale is valid and reliable for measuring nurses' practices in preventing patient falls in Vietnam.

Article Details

References

Bouldin E L, Andresen E M, Dunton N E, Simon M, et al, (2013), "Falls among adult patients hospitalized in the United States: prevalence and trends", J Patient Saf, 9 (1), pp. 13-17.
2. Polit D F, Beck C T, Owen S V, (2007), "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations", Res Nurs Health, 30 (4), pp. 459-467.
3. Hwang IY, (2011), The knowledge, attitude and fulfillment of practice guidelines for fall of clinical nurses at small and medium sized hostitals, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea, pp. 1-75.
4. Cho M-y, Jang S J, (2020), "Nurses' knowledge, attitude, and fall prevention practices at south Korean hospitals: a cross-sectional survey", BMC Nursing 19 (1), pp. 108.
5. Kim S-H, Seo J, (2017), "Geriatric Hospital Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude toward Falls, and Fall Prevention Activities", Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing, 19 pp. 81-91.
6. Brislin R W, (1970), "Back Translation for the Cross-Cultural Research", Journal of Cross Cultural Research, 1 pp. 185-216.
7. Ganabathi M, Mariappan U, Mustafa H, (2017), "Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practices on Fall Prevention in King Abdul Aziz Hospital, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia", Nursing & Primary Care, 1 pp. 1-6.
8. Suryani L, Perdani A, Dioso R, III, Hoon L, (2020), "Fall risk prevention: The related factors of nurses practice at general local hospital in Indonesia", Enfermería Clínica, 30 pp. 221-223.