SURVEY OF PHYSICIAN'S KNOWLEDGE IN TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC SEPTIC SHOCK IN CURRENT DAY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: sepsis and septic shock remain leading causes of death in children worldwide, including Vietnam. The study aimed to survey the application of guidelines in the practice of sepsis treatment by physicians in Vietnam. Method: This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey conducted among physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of pediatric sepsis, following the guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) 2020. Data were collected using a pre-designed questionnaire. Results: From May 2024 to June 2024, the study collected responses from 219 physicians. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1. Among the participants, 24.6% of physicians screened for septic shock within 5 minutes of patient presentation, and 86.3% used bolus fluid resuscitation (20 mL/kg). Additionally, 65.3% chose Adrenaline as the first-line vasopressor in septic shock. 96.8% of physicians administered antibiotics within 60 minutes of sepsis diagnosis, with Carbapenem being the most frequently used antibiotic (54.3%), often combined with Vancomycin (21.5%) or Aminoglycosides (21.5%). In addition, 26.0% had not attended training on the diagnosis and treatment of septic shock. Specifically, attending training sessions was significantly associated with the choice of vasopressor therapy in septic shock, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.13 (95% CI: 1.08 - 4.18, p = 0.028). Conclusions: The study provides an overview of the implementation of guidelines in the practice of treating sepsis in children. These findings will be useful in increasing participation in annual sepsis training courses in hospitals.
Article Details
Keywords
Septic shock; sepsis, survey; children
References
2. Nguyễn Hữu Châu Đức, Phạm Thị Ngọc Bích, Nguyễn Đắc Lương. Bước đầu nghiên cứu giá trị tiên lượng tử vong của hệ thống phân tầng (PIRO) ở bệnh nhi nhiễm khuẩn huyết tại trung tâm Nhi khoa, Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế. Tạp chí Nhi khoa 2024 2024;17(1):9-15.
3. Phung Nguyen The Nguyen, Bui Thanh Liem, Tran Diep Tuan. Sepsis in Pediatric in Vietnam: A Retrospective Study in Period 2008 to 2018. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2020; 11(1):179-184. doi:10.5530/srp.2020.1.24
4. Tổng cục thống kê dân số Việt Nam. Thông cáo báo chí về tình hình dân số, lao động việc làm Quý IV và năm 2023. Accessed truy cập ngày 7/9/2024,
5. Nguyễn Thị Diệu Thúy, Nguyễn Thị Việt Hà, Nguyễn Thị Thúy Hồng. Thực trạng và nhu cầu bác sĩ chuyên khoa Nhi làm việc tại Bệnh viện tuyến tỉnh, huyện theo các vùng sinh thái Việt Nam. Tạp chí Nhi khoa. 2022;15(5):107-114.
6. Niamsanit S., T. Saengthongpitag, R. Uppala, et al. Survey of Thai Physicians' Practice in Pediatric Septic Shock. Children (Basel, Switzerland). May 15 2024; 11(5)doi:10.3390/ children11050597
7. Hilarius K. W. E., P. W. Skippen, N. Kissoon. Early Recognition and Emergency Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Children. Pediatric emergency care. Feb 2020;36(2):101-106. doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000002043
8. Davis A. L., J. A. Carcillo, R. K. Aneja, et al. American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock. Critical care medicine. Jun 2017;45(6): 1061-1093. doi:10. 1097/ccm.0000000000002425
9. Weiss S. L., M. J. Peters, W. Alhazzani, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children. Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. Feb 2020;21(2):e52-e106. doi:10.1097/pcc.0000000000002198
10. Eric J. Lavonas, David J. Magid, Khalid Aziz, et al. Highlights of the 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC). American Heart Association 2020.