SURVEY OF FIBROSIS-4 INDEX AND NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE FIBROSIS SCORES IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC (DYSFUNCTION) ASSOCIATED FATTY LIVER DISEASE

Thị Kim Dung Phạm, Quang Đức Lê, Bình Nguyên Phạm, Công Long Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To survey the FIB-4 index, NAFLD Fibrosis score (NFS) and compare these indexes with Fibroscan in patients with fatty liver with metabolic disorders (nMAFLD). Subjects and methods: Including 398 MAFLD patients examined and treated at the Department of On-demand Examination and the Center for Gastroenterology - Hepatobiliary, Bach Mai Hospital from December 2023 to June 2024. Patients were assessed for FIB-4 index, NFS and compared with fibroscan in predicting the degree of liver fibrosis. Results: As a result of our study, we selected 398 MAFLD patients who fully met standart. Causes of comorbidities with MAFLD: 55.8% alone, 23.9% with VGB, 18.1% with alcohol, 723.9% with VGC. Mean age 48.46  ± 13.12 (18- 83) years old. Male/Female ratio: 2.1:1. Assessment of liver fibrosis level by severe fibrosis and cirrhosis indexes FIB4 (9.5%), NFS (7.3%), Fibroscan (14.3%). There was a good correlation between FIB4, NFS and Fibroscan on fibrosis level according to each group of associated causes: MAFLD alone with Kappa = 0.576 and 7.4 (p<0.01) (p < 0.01); MAFLD with alcohol with Kappa = 0.657 and 0.683 (p < 0.01); MAFLD with VGB with Kappa = 0.668 và 0.537  (p < 0.01); However, MAFLD with VGC with Kappa both = 1 but not statistically significant p > 0.05. However, according to the NFS classification, there were 63 patients (15.8) whose liver fibrosis could not be determined, so it was necessary to combine another classification system. Conclusion: There is a good correlation between FIB4, NFS and Fibroscan in terms of fibrosis according to each group of associated causes with kappa > 0.6. FIB4 can replace Fibroscan, while NFS must be combined with Fibroscan to assess the degree of liver fibrosis in MAFLD patients.

Article Details

References

Loomba R, Lim JK, Patton H, El-Serag HB. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Screening and Surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2020 May; 158(6):1822–30.
2. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):328–57.
3. Demerath EW, Reed D, Rogers N, Sun SS, Lee M, Choh AC, et al. Visceral adiposity and its anatomical distribution as predictors of the metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factor levels. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Nov; 88(5):1263–71.
4. Wu Y, Kumar R, Wang M, Singh M, Huang J, Zhu Y, et al. The Validation of Conventional Non-Invasive Fibrosis Scoring Systems in Patients with Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease. 2020.
5. Won Sohn, Heon- Ju Kwon, et al. Liver Fibrosis in Asians With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):e1135-e1148.
6. Lưu Xuân Phát và cộng sự (2024). Bệnh gan nhiễm mỡ liên quan chuyển hóa: tỷ lệ và mức độ xơ hóa gan đánh giá bằng Fibroscan. Tạp chí Y Dược học Phạm Ngọc Thạch. 2024; 3(1): 159-167
7. Cox B, Trasolini R, Galts C, Yoshida EM, Marquez V. Comparing the performance of Fibrosis-4 and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score with transient elastography scores of people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Can Liver J. 4(3):275–82.
8. Hang G, Liang Ping L. Value of Fibroscan combined with GPR,APRI,NFS or FIB-4 for progressive liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. lcgdbzz. 2020 Mar 20;36(3):541–5.