Article Sidebar

pdf
Issue: Vol. 545 No. 3 (2024)
Section: Các bài báo
DOI: 10.51298/vmj.v545i3.12426
Date Published: 23/12/2024
Views 247
Downloads 148
How to Cite
Nguyễn, T. T., & Phạm, Q. M. (2024). COMPARISON OF RECOVERY QUALITY BETWEEN MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA WITH TCI-PROPOFOL AND SEVOFLURANE FOR PARATHYROIDECTOMY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 545(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v545i3.12426

COMPARISON OF RECOVERY QUALITY BETWEEN MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA WITH TCI-PROPOFOL AND SEVOFLURANE FOR PARATHYROIDECTOMY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Thành Trung Nguyễn , Quang Minh Phạm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To compare the recovery quality between TCI-Propofol and Sevoflurane anesthesia maintenance for parathyroidectomy in patients undergoing periodic hemodialysis. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group S (Sevoflurane, n=30) and Group P (TCI-Propofol, n=30). Results: The results showed that the recovery quality between Group S and Group P was equivalent, with excellent, good, and moderate recovery rates of 76.7%, 16.7%, and 6.6%, respectively, compared to 80%, 3.3%, and 16.7% (p > 0.05). The proportion of patients with hypotension in Group P was higher than in Group S: 46.7% compared to 20%, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The number of patients requiring Ephedrine between Group S (10%) and Group P (20%) was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The rate of nausea and vomiting was higher in Group S (30%) compared to Group P (10%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The study indicates that both Propofol and Sevoflurane can be safely used in patients undergoing periodic hemodialysis for parathyroidectomy, with no clinically significant superiority between the two anesthetics

Keywords

: TCI Propofol, Sevoflurane, QoR-15 recovery quality, secondary hyperparathyroidism surgery

Article Details

References

Mathew A, Devereaux PJ, O’Hare A, et al. Chronic kidney disease and postoperative mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2008;73(9):1069-1081. doi:10.1038/ ki.2008.29
2. Bonanni A, Signori A, Alicino C, et al. Volatile Anesthetics versus Propofol for Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6): 1429-1446. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003236
3. Sayed S, Idriss NK, Sayyedf HG, et al. Effects of propofol and isoflurane on haemodynamics and the inflammatory response in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Br J Biomed Sci. 2015;72(3):93-101. doi:10.1080/09674845.2015.11666803
4. Cho HB, Kim MG, Park SY, et al. The influence of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative outcomes in end-stage renal disease patients: A retrospective observation study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254014
5. Niu Z, Gao X, Shi Z, et al. Effect of total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021; 73:110374. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110374
6. Kestenbaum B, Katz R, de Boer I, et al (2011). Vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and cardiovascular events among older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:1433–41.
7. Fredman B., Nathanson M.H., Smith I., et al (1995), “Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol”, Anesth Analg; 81: p. 823 - 828.
8. Thwaites A., Edmends S. and Smith I. (1997), “Inhalation induction with sevoflurane: a double-blind comparison with propofol”, British Journal of Anaesthesia; 78: p. 356 - 361.