Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 23/12/2024
Abstract Views: 30
Views pdf: 29
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v545i3.12426
Issue
Vol. 545 No. 3 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, T. T., & Phạm, Q. M. (2024). COMPARISON OF RECOVERY QUALITY BETWEEN MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA WITH TCI-PROPOFOL AND SEVOFLURANE FOR PARATHYROIDECTOMY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 545(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v545i3.12426

COMPARISON OF RECOVERY QUALITY BETWEEN MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA WITH TCI-PROPOFOL AND SEVOFLURANE FOR PARATHYROIDECTOMY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Thành Trung Nguyễn, Quang Minh Phạm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To compare the recovery quality between TCI-Propofol and Sevoflurane anesthesia maintenance for parathyroidectomy in patients undergoing periodic hemodialysis. Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group S (Sevoflurane, n=30) and Group P (TCI-Propofol, n=30). Results: The results showed that the recovery quality between Group S and Group P was equivalent, with excellent, good, and moderate recovery rates of 76.7%, 16.7%, and 6.6%, respectively, compared to 80%, 3.3%, and 16.7% (p > 0.05). The proportion of patients with hypotension in Group P was higher than in Group S: 46.7% compared to 20%, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The number of patients requiring Ephedrine between Group S (10%) and Group P (20%) was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The rate of nausea and vomiting was higher in Group S (30%) compared to Group P (10%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The study indicates that both Propofol and Sevoflurane can be safely used in patients undergoing periodic hemodialysis for parathyroidectomy, with no clinically significant superiority between the two anesthetics

Article Details

Keywords

: TCI Propofol, Sevoflurane, QoR-15 recovery quality, secondary hyperparathyroidism surgery

References

Mathew A, Devereaux PJ, O’Hare A, et al. Chronic kidney disease and postoperative mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2008;73(9):1069-1081. doi:10.1038/ ki.2008.29
2. Bonanni A, Signori A, Alicino C, et al. Volatile Anesthetics versus Propofol for Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6): 1429-1446. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003236
3. Sayed S, Idriss NK, Sayyedf HG, et al. Effects of propofol and isoflurane on haemodynamics and the inflammatory response in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Br J Biomed Sci. 2015;72(3):93-101. doi:10.1080/09674845.2015.11666803
4. Cho HB, Kim MG, Park SY, et al. The influence of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative outcomes in end-stage renal disease patients: A retrospective observation study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0254014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254014
5. Niu Z, Gao X, Shi Z, et al. Effect of total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021; 73:110374. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110374
6. Kestenbaum B, Katz R, de Boer I, et al (2011). Vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and cardiovascular events among older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:1433–41.
7. Fredman B., Nathanson M.H., Smith I., et al (1995), “Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol”, Anesth Analg; 81: p. 823 - 828.
8. Thwaites A., Edmends S. and Smith I. (1997), “Inhalation induction with sevoflurane: a double-blind comparison with propofol”, British Journal of Anaesthesia; 78: p. 356 - 361.