CLINICAL FEATURES, LABORATORY CHARACTERISTICS AND BRAIN IMAGING OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE METHANOL POISONING
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Describe the clinical, paraclinical and imaging of brain parenchymal lesions in patients with acute methanol poisoning. Methods: Retrospective description of 86 patients (83 men and 3 women, average age 52.86 ± 11.73 years) diagnosed with acute methanol poisoning and underwent computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain at Bach Mai Hospital for clinical, paraclinical and brain imaging characteristics. Results: The results of CT/MRI imaging of the brain showed that 68/86 (79.1%) patients had brain parenchymal lesions. Of which, bilateral symmetrical lesions of the putamen accounted for 37.2%, cerebral hemorrhage (29.1%), diffuse cerebral edema (24.4%), subcortical white matter lesions (24.4%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (3.4%), and cerebellar lesions (8.1%). These findings were associated with blood pH, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), alcoholism, positive PXAS, pO2, lactate, hyperosmolarity, increased osmolarity gap, and methanol concentration (p < 0.05). The brain lesions on CT/MRI most predictive of poor prognosis were bilateral symmetrical putamen lesions, intracerebral hemorrhage, diffuse cerebral edema, subcortical white matter lesions. Conclusion: Patients with acute methanol poisoning who have severe acidosis, low GCS, low pH, low oxygen saturation, and high glucose concentration should undergo brain imaging. Brain lesions provide valuable information for the diagnosis and management of patients with acute methanol poisoning.
Article Details
Keywords
acute poisoning, methanol, brain imaging.
References
2. Barceloux D.G, et al. (2002). American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol, 40(4), 415-46.
3. Eyup C., Ahmet M. H. (2022) CT and MR Imaging Findings in Methanol Intoxication Manifesting with BI Lateral Severe Basal Ganglia and Cerebral Involvement, Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology, 106(1): 66
4. Morteza S. T., Hossein H. M., et al (2010). The value of brain CT findings in acute methanol toxicity, European Journal of Radiology, 73(2): 211 - 214
5. Lee C.Y., Chang E.K., Lin J.L., et al (2014). Risk factors for mortality in Asian Taiwanese patients with methanol poisoning. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 10, 61-7.
6. Saeid E., Arash T., Sedighe Hi., et al (2023). Methanol poisoning during the COVID‐19 pandemicin Iran:A retrospective cross‐sectional study of clinical, laboratory, and brain imaging characteristics and outcomes. Health Sci. Rep. 2023;6:e1752.
7. Sefidbakht S., Rasekhi A.R., Kamali K., et al (2007). Methanol poisoning: acute MR and CT findings in nine patients, Neuroradiology. 49(5), 427-35.
8. Wedge M.K., Natarajan S., Johanson C., et al (2012). The safety of ethanol infusions for the treatment of methanol or ethylene glycol intoxication: an observational study. CJEM; 14(5):283-9
9. Zakharov S., Nurieva O., Kotikova K., et al (2017). Positive serum ethanol concentration on admission to hospital as the factor predictive of treatment outcome in acute methanol poisoning. Monatsh Chem, 148(3):409-419.