Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 24/10/2021
Abstract Views: 1200
Views PDF: 601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v506i2.1299
Issue
Vol. 506 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị May, P. ., Như Hùng, P. ., & al., et. (2021). ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION BY THE HEARTQOL SCALE. Vietnam Medical Journal, 506(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v506i2.1299

ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION BY THE HEARTQOL SCALE

Phan Thị May1,, Phạm Như Hùng1, et al.1
1 Hanoi Heart Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of the study was investigated the quality of life for patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) by HeartQol questionnaire. Methods & Results: From June 2020 to February 2021, we prospectively enrolled 150 patients after percutaneous coronary intervention, aged 63.7 ± 10.3 years (66,7% male) were measured by HeartQoL score. The average score of overall quality of life after PCI is singnificantly improved before intervention (2.1 ± 0.4 to 2.5 ± 0.3; p< 0.001). Quality of life score in the physical domain aspects singnificantly improves from 1.9 ± 0.4 before PCI to 2.4 ± 0.4 after PCI  (p < 0.05). The sex characteristics, education level, age, chest pain after PCI and NYHA are related to the quality of life of patients after PCI (p < 0.05). Conclusion : Our study shows that the majority of patients had improved quality of life after six months of PCI. Sex characteristics, education level, age, chest pain after PCI and NYHA are related to the quality of life of patients.

Article Details

Keywords

HeartQol, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Cardiovascular

References

1. Nguyễn Thị Kim Sáng (2019), Nghiên cứu Chất lượng cuộc sống của bệnh nhân sau can thiệp mạch vành trên bệnh nhân hội chứng vành cấp hoặc bệnh tim thiếu máu cục bộ dựa trên bộ câu hỏi SeatAngina. Tạp chí tim mạch học.
2. Darvishpour, A., et al.(2017), Factors associated with quality of life in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 11(4): p. 35-41.
3. Yinko, S.S.L.L., et al.(2014), Health 2010; Related Quality of Life in Premature Acute Coronary Syndrome: Does Patient Sex or Gender Really Matter? 3(4): p. e000901.
4. Jankowska-Polańska, B., et al.(2016), Sex differences in the quality of life of patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention after a 3-year follow-up. Patient Prefer Adherence, 10: p. 1279-87.
5. Li, R., et al.(2012), Quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly with acute coronary syndrome. International Journal of Cardiology, 155(1): p. 90-96.
6. Shan, L., A. Saxena, and R. McMahon (2014), A systematic review on the quality of life benefits after percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly. Cardiology, 129(1): p. 46-54.
7. Yazdani-Bakhsh, R., et al. (2016), Comparison of health-related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery. ARYA Atheroscler, 12(3): p. 124-131.
8. Holubkov, R., et al.(2002) Angina 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry. American Heart Journal, 144(5): p. 826-833.
9. Ben‐Yehuda, O., et al.(2016), Angina and associated healthcare costs following percutaneous coronary intervention: a real‐world analysis from a multi‐payer database. 88(7): p. 1017-1024.