EVALUATION OF COCHLEA SIZE ON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the size characteristics of normal and malformed cochleas on computed tomography in cochlear implant. Material and Methods: Descriptive study of the size of normal and malformed cochleas on preoperative imaging in cochlear implants. The inner ear was evaluated on CT and MRI, and the size of the cochlea was evaluated on high-resolution CT. Results: The study included 166 patients with 332 ears, including 170 ears with inner ear malformations. The group with normal inner ear had an average transverse diameter of the cochlear basal turn were 9,03±0,32mm. Cochlear hypoplasia and incomplete partition Type III had the smallest cochlear size with transverse diameters of the cochlear basal turn were 7,97±0.63mm and 7,99±0.5mm, respectively. Conclusion: Inner ear malformations have diverse cochlear shapes and sizes. Severe malformations such as labyrinthine aplasia, cochlear aplasia, and cochlear hypoplasia Type 1 have no indication for cochlear implant. For malformations that have indication for cochlear implant, depending on the type of malformation, it is necessary to choose an electrode suitable for the size and shape of the cochlea.
Article Details
Keywords
cochlear size, computed tomography, cochlear implantation
References

2. Iseli, C., Adunka, O., and Buchman, C. (2016). Cochlear Nerve Deficiency. Pediatric Cochlear Implantation, Springer. p. 227-235.

3. Escude, B., James, C., Deguine, O., et al (2006). The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurootol, 11 Suppl 1: p. 27-33.

4. Nair, G., Vadivu, S., Sampathkumar, R., et al (2017). A Study of Anomalies of Cochlea and Cochlear Nerve in Children with Congenital Profound Hearing Loss–An Indian Perspective.

5. Agarwal, S.K., Singh, S., Ghuman, S.S., et al (2014). Radiological assessment of the Indian children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. International journal of otolaryngology, 2014.

6. Sennaroğlu, L. and Tahir, E. (2020). A Novel Classification: Anomalous Routes of the Facial Nerve in Relation to Inner Ear Malformations. The Laryngoscope.

7. Giesemann, A.M., Kontorinis, G., Jan, Z., et al (2012). The vestibulocochlear nerve: aplasia and hypoplasia in combination with inner ear malformations. European radiology, 22(3): p. 519-524.

8. Meng, J., Li, S., Zhang, F., et al (2016). Cochlear size and shape variability and implications in cochlear implantation surgery. Otology & Neurotology, 37(9): p. 1307-1313.

9. Liu, Y.-K., Qi, C.-L., Tang, J., et al (2017). The diagnostic value of measurement of cochlear length and height in temporal bone CT multiplanar reconstruction of inner ear malformation. Acta oto-laryngologica, 137(2): p. 119-126.

10. Zahara, D., Dewi, R.D., Aboet, A., et al (2019). Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates. International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 23(02): p. 184-190.
