MANAGEMENT OF SECONDARY HEMORRHAGE AFTER HEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN LONGO PROCEDURE PATIENTS

Duy Nguyễn Hoàng, Hưng Dương Phước, Chương Lê Châu Hoàng Quốc, Tiến Lê Vũ Việt

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, Longo surgery has become increasingly popular due to its advantages, such as less pain and faster recovery. However, hemorrhage after hemorrhoidectomy remains a significant concern. We developed and implemented the protocol " Management of Secondary Hemorrhage After Hemorrhoidectomy" at the Proctology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Campus I (UMC HCMC CI), starting from January 1, 2017. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the protocol in patients undergoing Longo surgery at the Proctology Department, UMC HCMC CI during the study period. Materials and Methods: A case series study was conducted on 46 patients who experienced secondary bleeding after Longo hemorrhoidectomy from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024, at the Proctology Department, UMC HCMC CI. Results: 2 patients required surgical hemostasis after failing to respond to Foley catheter tamponade. 19 patients were managed with Foley catheter placement combined with irrigation, 4 patients underwent enema due to fecal impaction, and the remaining 23 patients stabilized with conservative treatment. The incidence of secondary bleeding was 0.98%. Conclusion: The protocol demonstrated promising results and requires further long-term evaluation. The inpatient treatment duration was relatively short; however, further research is required to identify factors contributing to prolonged hospitalization. Fecal impaction is an important risk factor. The Foley catheter placement technique requires further investigation.

Article Details

References

1. J. McGuinness (2004), “Balloon tamponade to control haemorrhage following transanal rectal surgery”, Int J Colorectal Dis, (19), pp 395-396.
2. Francis J. Burns (1961), “Bleeding after Hemorrhoidectomy”, American Proctologic Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
3. Frederick E. Farrer (1961), “Delayed Postoperative Anorectal Hemorrhage”, Mexican Proctologic Society and the American Proctologic Society, Mexico City, Mexico.
4. Hyung Kyu Yang (2014), Hemorrhoids, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp 105-107.
5. Maria Pescatori (2008), “Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures”, Tech Coloproctol, (12), pp. 7-19
6. Maria Pescatori (2012), Prevention and Treatment of Complications in Proctological Surgery, Springer-Verlag Italia, pp 39-40.
7. S. Giuratrabocchetta et al. (2012), “Safety and short-term effectiveness of EEA stapler vs PPH stapler in the treatment of degree III haemorrhoids: prospective randomized controlled trial”, Colorectal Disease The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, (15), pp. 354–35.
8. Takaaki Yano (2009), “The Outcome of Postoperative Hemorrhaging Following a Hemorrhoidectomy”,Surg Today, Vol 39,pp.866-869.