FACIAL SHAPE ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY AT HO CHI MINH CITY ON STANDARDIZED IMAGES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To identify and classify the facial shapes of students of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City based on standardized facial images and to evaluate the associated anthropometric characteristics. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted on 400 students (200 males, 200 females). Facial images were captured under standardized conditions and analyzed based on anthropometric parameters such as bizygomatic width (Zy-Zy), bigonial width (Go-Go), and forehead width (Ft-Ft) to determine facial shape classification. Results: The oval face shape was the most prevalent in both males (45%), females (55%), and the total sample (50%). The square face shape was more common in males (35%) than in females (30%). The triangular face shape was the least frequent (17.5%). Significant statistical differences were observed among facial shapes in the Zy-Zy, Go-Go, and Ft-Ft measurements. Conclusion: The oval face shape was the most common, followed by the square face shape, while the triangular face shape was the least common. Only three anthropometric indices, Zy-Zy, Go-Go, and Ft-Ft, exhibited statistically significant differences among the facial shapes. At the same time, other transverse dimensions showed no significant variation between the three face types.
Article Details
Keywords
Anthropometry, facial shapes, standardized images.
References
2. Võ Trương Như Ngọc (2021). Phân tích kích thước khuôn mặt theo hình dạng khuôn mặt người Việt từ 18 đến 25 tuổi tại Bình Dương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam tập 502, số 1, 141-144.
3. Đinh Sỹ Mạnh (2017). Nghiên cứu một số kích thước chỉ số nhân trắc vùng đầu mặt và hình thái tháp mũi sinh viên Y tuổi từ 18-25 trên ảnh kỹ thuật số. Luận văn thạc sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội.
4. Celebi, M. E., & Smalley, K. (2012). Facial shape analysis and classification in dermatology and aesthetic medicine. Journal of Aesthetic Medicine, 4(2), 85-102.
5. Jerolimov, V. (2004). Craniofacial morphology and facial aesthetics: Anthropometric and cephalometric analysis. Croatian Dental Journal, 35(3), 189-200.