CASE REPORT: A CASE OF LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL CECECTOMY FOR LOW-GRADE APPENDICULAR MUCOUS NEOPLASM
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (AMN) is a rare disease. Most patients do not exhibit specific symptoms, and the disease is often discovered incidentally during surgery, CT scans, abdominal ultrasounds, or colonoscopies. The treatment of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm remains controversial, primarily revolving around issues of diagnosis and classification of AMN prior to surgery, the choice of surgical method, and the extent of the surgical procedure. Clinical Case: A 72-year-old female patient was admitted with dull abdominal pain in the right iliac fossa, which had persisted for about 3 months. Her white blood cell count was 4.73 k/uL, with neutrophils at 51.9%. An abdominal ultrasound revealed a cystic lesion measuring approximately 86 x 18 mm, and MSCT indicated that the appendix was enlarged, measuring about 25 mm in diameter, with fluid in the lumen and no surrounding infiltration. The patient underwent a 60-minute laparoscopic surgery to remove the appendix and part of the cecum using an automatic anastomosis cutter and a 60 mm endoscopic stapler. The patient was discharged on - the 3rd postoperative day without complications. Conclusion: AMN is a rare disease, often discovered incidentally through imaging diagnosis. Laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred treatment method for appendiceal mucocele. The use of an automatic anastomosis cutter in endoscopy also enhances accuracy, shortens surgery time, and reduces the risk of complications, achieving a high success rate.
Article Details
Keywords
Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm, Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm, Laparoscopic surgery
References
2. Singh MP. A general overview of mucocele of appendix. J Family Med Prim Care. Dec 2020; 9(12): 5867-5871. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc _1547_20
3. Morano WF, Gleeson EM, Sullivan SH, et al. Clinicopathological Features and Management of Appendiceal Mucoceles: A Systematic Review. Am Surg. Feb 1 2018;84(2):273-281.
4. Đỗ Thị Thu Thảo, Đỗ Hải Thanh Anh, Võ Tấn Đức, sự vc. Khảo sát đặc điểm hình ảnh chụp cắt lớp vi tính của u nhầy ruột thừa. Y học TP Hồ Chí Minh. 2021;25(1)(1):38 – 45.
5. Lien WC, Huang SP, Chi CL, et al. Appendiceal outer diameter as an indicator for differentiating appendiceal mucocele from appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. Nov 2006;24(7):801-5. doi:10.1016/ j.ajem.2006.04.003
6. Vyas J, Badgurjar M, Saxena P, Parihar S, Thakor P. Prudent planning in management of mucocele of appendix. Int J Surg Case Rep. Apr 2021; 81:105766. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.105766
7. Vashistha N, Deo A, Singhal D. Gastrointestinal: Mucocele appendix with atypical "volcano sign". J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Jan 2022;37(1):45. doi:10.1111/jgh.15541
8. Lê Minh Huy, My DHT. Đặc điểm giải phẫu bệnh tân sinh chế nhày ruột thừa. Y học Việt Nam. 2022;521(242 - 248)(12)
9. Sun P, Jiang F, Sun H, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for appendiceal intussusception caused by mucocele of the appendix: case report and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 2020; 11(1): 102-107. doi:10.21037/jgo.2019. 12.01
10. Khan A, AlSubaie RS, Almohammed Saleh AA. Mucocele of the Appendix: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus. Jun 2023;15(6): e40168. doi:10.7759/cureus.40168