IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF RENAL CANCER BIOPSIED UNDER COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY GUIDANCE AT HANOI ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL

Đỗ Đạt Lê, Thái Bình Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate certain clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with renal cancer who underwent biopsy under CT guidance. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 33 patients with renal cancer who were diagnosed and underwent surgery at Hanoi Oncology Hospital from January 2022 to January 2025. Outcomes: The average age of patients was 51.55 ± 13.89 years. Asymptomatic cases accounted for 60.6%, while symptomatic cases made up 39.4%. The location of renal cancer in the upper, middle, or lower poles of both kidneys showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).  Tumors measuring 4 to 7 cm were the most common, accounting for 48.56%. The size distribution among tumor groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.103 > 0.05). The most frequently observed tumor characteristic was renal capsule bulging (91%), while capsular invasion was the least common (3%). Arterial-phase hyperenhancement was the most common contrast enhancement pattern, observed in 60.6% of cases, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Intratumoral hemorrhage and necrosis were present in 21% and 27% of cases, respectively. Perirenal lymphadenopathy was found in 3 patients (9%). Renal venous thrombosis was observed in 3% of patients. The most common type of renal carcinoma is clear cell carcinoma, accounting for 48.48%. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma ranks second, making up 21.21%. Papillary renal cell carcinoma accounts for 9.1%, while other types of kidney cancer are rare. Conclusion: Renal cancer is commonly found in middle-aged or elderly patients and is often detected incidentally. On CT imaging, renal cancer typically exhibits strong arterial-phase contrast enhancement. Additionally, other features such as hemorrhage, necrosis, renal vein thrombosis and perirenal lymphadenopathy may also be observed.

Article Details

References

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(1)
2. Hélénon O, Eiss D, De Brito P, Merran S, Correas J-M. Comment je caractérise une masse rénale solide: proposition d’une nouvelle classification pour une approche simplifiée. Journal de Radiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle. 2012;93(4):254-267.
3. Thi NV. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm hình ảnh của cắt lớp vi tính đa dãy và giá trị của sinh thiết kim cắt qua da trong chẩn đoán ung thư thận ở người lớn. 2018.
4. Cornelis F, Balageas P, Le Bras Y, et al. Les ablations thermiques rénales sous guidage radiologique. Journal de Radiologie diagnostique et interventionnelle. 2012;93(4):268-284.
5. Weizer AZ, Gilbert SM, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS. Tailoring technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumor characteristics. The Journal of urology. 2008;180(4):1273-1278.
6. Welch TJ, LeRoy AJ. Helical and electron beam CT scanning in the evaluation of renal vein involvement in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 1997;21(3):467-471.
7. Tadayoni A, Paschall AK, Malayeri AA. Assessing lymph node status in patients with kidney cancer. Translational andrology and urology. 2018;7(5):766.