DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY IMAGING AND OUTCOMES OF UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION PRIOR TO TERMINATION OF CESAREAN SCAR PREGNANCY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP) is a condition in which the gestational sac is implanted within the cesarean section scar of the uterus, a structurally weak site in the myometrium. CSP can result in massive hemorrhage, uterine rupture, and pose life-threatening risks to the patient as well as jeopardize future fertility. This study aimed to describe the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) imaging features and treatment outcomes of CSP termination in order to optimize therapeutic strategies. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 52 patients with CSP who underwent uterine artery embolization at the Center for Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Vietduc University Hospital, followed by dilation and curettage at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Pre- and post-embolization DSA findings, the rate of intrauterine balloon tamponade, and hospital stay were analyzed. Results: CSP vascularity on DSA was classified as follows: Grade I (23/52 patients, 44.2%), Grade II (19/52 patients, 36.6%), and Grade III (10/52 patients, 19.2%). Collateral blood supply was observed in 6/52 cases, including the superior vesical artery in 4 cases, bilateral ovarian arteries in 1 case, and the middle rectal artery in 1 case. In total, 21/52 patients required intrauterine balloon tamponade for hemostasis after dilation and curettage. No major complications occurred. The median hospital stay following pregnancy termination was 1 day (IQR: 1–2). Patients with Grade III vascularity on DSA had a significantly higher rate of intrauterine balloon tamponade and longer hospital stay compared with Grade I and II groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion: DSA-based vascular grading of CSP provides detailed information on lesion vascularity and facilitates the planning of effective hemostatic strategies following dilation and curettage.
Article Details
Keywords
Cesarean scar pregnancy, digital subtraction angiography, uterine artery embolization, dilation and curettage
References
2. Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Nielsen HS. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertility and Sterility. 2016;105(4):958-967. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130
3. Marchand GJ, Masoud AT, Coriell C, et al. Treatment of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy in China with Uterine Artery Embolization-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(24):7393. doi:10.3390/jcm11247393
4. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancies: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006; 107(6): 1373-1381. doi:10.1097/01.AOG. 0000218690.24494.ce
5. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;207(1):44.e1-44.e13. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018
6. Gao F, Lu Y, Guo X, et al. Complex Blood Supply Patterns in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Insights from Digital Subtraction Angiography Imaging. Med Sci Monit. 2023;29:e940133-1-e940133-10. doi:10.12659/MSM.940133
7. Qiao B, Zhang Z, Li Y. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2016;23(7):1040-1048. doi:10.1016/ j.jmig.2016.08.819