ACCURACY AND FIT OF PRE-SURGICAL SIMULATED OBTURATORS VERSUS POST-SURGICAL ACTUAL OBTURATORS IN PATIENTS AFTER PARTIAL MAXILLECTOMY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and suitability of the pre-surgical simulated obturator and the post-surgical actual obturator in patients undergoing partial maxillectomy. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted on 20 patients indicated for partial maxillectomy, including (17 cases of IIb, 2 cases of IIc, and 1 case of IId) according to the Brown classification, who underwent pre-surgical obturator fabrication with the support of 3D technology. Patients were re-examined at least 1 month after surgery, and post-surgical obturator scanning was performed. Comparison between the pre-surgical obturator and the obturator at re-examination was conducted using the open-source software Medit Design to assess the accuracy and suitability of the obturator at the two time points. Results: The 3D design method demonstrated good accuracy in the majority of cases, but not perfect and with variation among patients – consistent with the observation that some patients had smooth obturator placement (no adjustments needed), while others required adding or trimming resin. The average deviation (avg mean = -0.025 mm) is close to 0, with a median = 0.0025 mm, indicating that the 3D-designed obturator generally fits well with the remaining tissue immediately after surgery. The dispersion (sd mean = 0.209 mm, RMS = 0.212 mm) is at an acceptable level, but max sd = 0.648 mm and min In tol = 52.83% indicate cases of poor fit (requiring extensive adjustments). This explains why some patients need added resin (to compensate for negative deviations) or trimming (for positive deviations, max mean = 1.839 mm). Conclusion: The pre-surgical fabricated obturator design with 3D technology support is accurate and highly effective (good fit ~87%), helping to reduce discomfort and improve function immediately after surgery. However, it does not achieve absolute accuracy due to the varying degrees of injury in each patient, as well as deviations during the surgical process, leading to the necessity of obturator adjustments in some patients.
Article Details
Keywords
Immediate Obturator, Surgical Obturator
References
2. Wei F-C, Celick N, Chen H-C, et al. Combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:45-52.
3. Cordeiro PG, Santamaria E. A classification system and algorithm for reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2331-2346.
4. Brown JS, Shaw RJ. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classification. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(10):1001-1008.
5. Kääriäinen M, Kuuskeri M, Gremoutis G, Kuokkanen H, Miettinen A, Laranne J. Utilization of three-dimensional computer-aided preoperative virtual planning and manufacturing in maxillary and mandibular reconstruction with a microvascular fibula
6. Anh Tuan Ta, Duc Thanh Le, Minh Tuan Dam, Thi Trang Phuong, Duc Minh Nguyen, Hoang Tuan Pham, Minh Son Tong. Design Process and Early Functional Outcomes of Digitally Planned Immediate Obturator Prostheses After Partial Maxillectomy
7. Gustaaf J C van Baar, Kitty Schipper, Tymour Forouzanfar, Lars Leeuwrik, Henri A H Winters, Angela Ridwan-Pramana, Frank K J Leusink. Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Surgery in Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
8. Chouksey, Gunjan; Singh, Gurkaran Pree; Gupta, Vikas; Sahoo, Prasanta; Choure, Rupali; Goyal, Anima. A pilot study comparing conventional and digital impression techniques for speech analysis using Hindi vowels in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with an obturator