SURGICAL OUTCOMES AND RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate surgical outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma and to analyze the association between these two domains. Materials and methods: A descriptive cohort of 98 patients with FIGO stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer treated from 2019 to 2025 at Hanoi Medical University Hospital and K Hospital; all patients received NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Results: Mean age 59.4 ± 9.0 years; 92.9% had ECOG performance status 0–1. The overall response rate was 95.9% for omental disease and 94.9% for ovarian tumors, with complete responses exceeding 44%. A Chemotherapy Response Score of 3 (CRS3) was observed in 16% of cases. R0 cytoreduction (no macroscopic residual disease) was achieved in 82.6%. Postoperative morbidity was low (bowel obstruction 1.0%, hemorrhage 3.1%). Conclusions: NACT followed by IDS is effective and safe in advanced-stage disease, yielding high R0 rates; however, the depth of histopathologic response remains limited (CRS3 16%), underscoring the persistent challenge of complete eradication of malignant cells.
Article Details
Keywords
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, interval debulking surgery
References
2. Vergote I, Coens C, Nankivell M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19(12): 1680-1687. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045 (18)30566-7
3. Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2015;386(9990):249-257. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6
4. Böhm S, Faruqi A, Said I, et al. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(22): 2457-2463. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014. 60.5212
5. Nakamura K, Kitahara Y, Nishimura T, et al. Nadir CA-125 serum levels during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and no residual tumor at interval debulking surgery predict prognosis in advanced stage ovarian cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18:200. doi:10.1186/s12957-020-01978-6
6. Matsuo K, Machida H, Mariani A, et al. Adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy and survival of women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 29(5). doi:10.3802/ jgo.2018.29.e69
7. Meng Qin, Ying Jin, Li Ma, Yan-Yan Zhang, L. Pan. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Oncotarget. 2017;9:8614-8628. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.23808
8. Michaan N, Chong WY, Han NY, Lim MC, Park SY. Prognostic Value of Pathologic Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients With Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(9). doi:10.1097/ IGC.0000000000001366
9. Nero C, Fagotti A, Zannoni GF, Palluzzi E, Scambia G, Petrillo M. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: utility of a scoring system to predict outcomes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(6). doi:10.1136/ijgc-2019-000232
10. Onda T, Satoh T, Ogawa G, et al. Comparison of survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers in phase III randomised trial. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2020; 130: 114-125. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2020. 02.020