SURGICAL OUTCOMES AND RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER

Văn Tỵ Ngô, Xuân Hậu Nguyễn, Thị Huyền Phùng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate surgical outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma and to analyze the association between these two domains. Materials and methods: A descriptive cohort of 98 patients with FIGO stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer treated from 2019 to 2025 at Hanoi Medical University Hospital and K Hospital; all patients received NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Results: Mean age 59.4 ± 9.0 years; 92.9% had ECOG performance status 0–1. The overall response rate was 95.9% for omental disease and 94.9% for ovarian tumors, with complete responses exceeding 44%. A Chemotherapy Response Score of 3 (CRS3) was observed in 16% of cases. R0 cytoreduction (no macroscopic residual disease) was achieved in 82.6%. Postoperative morbidity was low (bowel obstruction 1.0%, hemorrhage 3.1%). Conclusions: NACT followed by IDS is effective and safe in advanced-stage disease, yielding high R0 rates; however, the depth of histopathologic response remains limited (CRS3 16%), underscoring the persistent challenge of complete eradication of malignant cells.

Article Details

References

Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
2. Vergote I, Coens C, Nankivell M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19(12): 1680-1687. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045 (18)30566-7
3. Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2015;386(9990):249-257. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6
4. Böhm S, Faruqi A, Said I, et al. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(22): 2457-2463. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014. 60.5212
5. Nakamura K, Kitahara Y, Nishimura T, et al. Nadir CA-125 serum levels during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and no residual tumor at interval debulking surgery predict prognosis in advanced stage ovarian cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18:200. doi:10.1186/s12957-020-01978-6
6. Matsuo K, Machida H, Mariani A, et al. Adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy and survival of women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 29(5). doi:10.3802/ jgo.2018.29.e69
7. Meng Qin, Ying Jin, Li Ma, Yan-Yan Zhang, L. Pan. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Oncotarget. 2017;9:8614-8628. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.23808
8. Michaan N, Chong WY, Han NY, Lim MC, Park SY. Prognostic Value of Pathologic Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients With Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(9). doi:10.1097/ IGC.0000000000001366
9. Nero C, Fagotti A, Zannoni GF, Palluzzi E, Scambia G, Petrillo M. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: utility of a scoring system to predict outcomes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(6). doi:10.1136/ijgc-2019-000232
10. Onda T, Satoh T, Ogawa G, et al. Comparison of survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers in phase III randomised trial. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2020; 130: 114-125. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2020. 02.020