TRANSVERSE ANALYSIS OF MAXILLA WITH SKELETAL CLASS III MALOCCLUSION: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY

Nữ Cẩm Chi Nguyễn, Thị Bích Ngọc Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To study the transverse widths of maxilla in Skeletal Class III malocclusion patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Reasearch methodology: Cross – sectional describle study on 37 CTCB films of  Skeletal Class III malocclusion patients (23 males, 14 females) at the School of Dentisty – Hanoi Medical University. Inter-buccal and inter-lingual bone widths were measured at the levels of  hard palate, alveolar crest and the furcation level of the  maxillary first molar. Results: the transverse widths of maxila: Inter- buccal: at the levels of hard palate by  66,3 ± 4,9mm for male, 62,0 ± 3,1mm for female, 64,7 ± 4,7mm for average; at the levels of first molar alveolar crest by 58,3 ± 3,3mm for male, 55,0 ± 2,6mm for female, 57,1± 3,4mm for average; furcation level of the maxilla first molar by 48,0 ± 2,7mm for male, 43,9 ± 1,9mm for female, 46,5 ± 3,1mm for average. Conclusions: (1) Males’ maxillary inter-buccal bone and inter-lingal bone widths on the first molar are wider than the corresponding females’ widths. (2) At the furcation level of the first molar. On average, the maxilla bone widths was 46,5 ±  3,1mm.

Article Details

References

Đống Khắc Thẩm, Hoàng Tử Hùng (2000), Khảo Sát Tình Trạng Khớp Cắn Của Người Việt Nam Độ Tuổi 17 – 27, Luận Văn Thạc Sỹ Đại Học Y Dược Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh, Tuyển Tập Công Trình Nghiên Cứu Khoa Học Răng Hàm Mặt.
2. Quách thị thuý Lan (2016), Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, Xquang và đánh giá kết quả điều trị lệch lạc khớp cắn loại III Angle bằng hệ thống mắc cài MBT. Luận văn tiến sỹ y học Đại Học Y Hà Nội.
3. Maxillary advancement. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1991;6:71-80.
4. Uysal T, Usumez S, Memili B, Sari Z. Dental and Alveolar Arch Widths in Normal Occlusion and Class III Malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2005;75:809-13.
5. Ricketts, R.M.; Grummons, D. Frontal cephalometrics: Practical applications, part 1. World J. Orthod. 2003, 4, 297–316.
6. McNamara, J.A.; Brudon, W.L. Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition; Needham Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1993.
7. Major, P.W.; Johnson, D.E.; Hesse, K.L.; Glover, K.E. Landmark Identification Error in Posterior Anterior Cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1994, 64, 447–454.
8. Thurow, R.C. Cephalometric methods in research and private practice. Angle Orthod. 1951, 21, 104–116.
9. Major, P.W.; Johnson, D.E.; Hesse, K.L.; Glover, K.E. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification. Angle Orthod. 1996, 66, 51–60.
10. Koo YJ, Choi SH, Keum BT, et al. Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod. 2017;47(3):167. doi:10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167