THE PROPORTION OF CONSERVATIVE SURGERY OF OVARIAN TORSION AND RELATED FACTORS AT HUNG VUONG HOSPITAL

Phương Nhi Võ , Xuân Vũ Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Ovarian torsion is a gynecological emergency. The two main surgical treatment methods are ovarian conservation and adnexectomy. The ACOG 2019 recommends a minimally invasive surgical approach with detorsion and preservation of the adnexal structures regardless of the appearance of the ovary. A surgeon should not remove a torsed ovary unless oophorectomy is unavoidable, such as when a severely necrotic ovary falls apart. Objectives: Determine the rate of ovarian conservation surgery in the treatment of ovarian torsion at Hung Vuong Hospital from January 2020 to March 2023. Determine the relationship between the rate of ovarian preservation surgery in the treatment of ovarian torsion with: age, obstetric and gynecological characteristics, clinical symptoms and paraclinical tests (leukemia, ultrasound) and ovarian tumor characteristics at surgery. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study on 355 patients with ovarian torsion at Hung Vuong hospital from January 2020 to March 2023. Results: The proportion of ovarian preservation surgery was 67% with 95% CI [59.3% - 71.3%]. Related factors that increase the rate of ovarian preservation surgery include: the age group under 18 years old is 12.5 times higher than the group over 45 years old, 95% CI [1.9-82.1], the 18 - 45 year olds are 2.1 times higher than those over 45 years old, 95% CI [1.7-6.3]. Time from the patient's onset of abdominal pain to admission to the hospital: 24 - 48 hours is 3.6 times higher than pain duration over 48 hours 95% CI [1,3-10]. Without symptoms of vomiting, nausea is 7.2 times higher than the 95% CI [3.1-16.9]. Number of twists: 1 twist has a higher conservation rate than 3 twists or more, 6.6 times 95% CI [2.6-17.2] and 2 twists is 3.8 times higher than 3 twists or more than 95% CI [1.6-8.7]. Conclusions: The rate of ovarian preservation surgery at Hung Vuong hospital is 67%. Related factors that increase the rate of ovarian preservation surgery include: younger patient age, shorter time from abdominal pain onset to hospitalization, no symptoms of vomiting or nausea, and number of ovarian twists less than.

Article Details

References

1. Oelsner G, Shashar D. Adnexal torsion. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. Sep 2006;49(3):459-63. doi:10.1097/00003081-200609000-00006
2. Hibbard LT. Adnexal torsion. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. Jun 15 1985;152(4): 456-61. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80157-5
3. White M, Stella J. Ovarian torsion: 10-year perspective. Emergency medicine Australasia: EMA. Jun 2005;17(3):231-7. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00728.x
4. Varras M, Tsikini A, Polyzos D, Samara C, Hadjopoulos G, Akrivis C. Uterine adnexal torsion: pathologic and gray-scale ultrasonographic findings. Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology. 2004; 31(1):34-8.
5. Houry D, Abbott JT. Ovarian torsion: a fifteen-year review. Annals of emergency medicine. Aug 2001;38(2):156-9. doi:10.1067/mem.2001.114303
6. Anders JF, Powell EC. Urgency of evaluation and outcome of acute ovarian torsion in pediatric patients. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. Jun 2005;159(6): 532-5. doi:10.1001/ archpedi.159.6.532
7. Huang C, Hong MK, Ding DC. A review of ovary torsion. Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal. Jul-Sep 2017;29(3): 143-147. doi:10. 4103/tcmj.tcmj_55_17
8. Gynecologists TACoOa. Adnexal Torsion in Adolescents: ACOG Committee Opinion No, 783. Obstetrics and gynecology. Aug 2019;134(2):e56-e63. doi:10.1097/aog. 0000000000003373
9. Wang JH, Wu DH, Jin H, Wu YZ. Predominant etiology of adnexal torsion and ovarian outcome after detorsion in premenarchal girls. European journal of pediatric surgery: official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. Sep 2010;20(5): 298-301. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1254110
10. Harkins G. Ovarian torsion treated with untwisting: second look 36 hours after untwisting. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. May-Jun 2007;14(3):270. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.006