THE VALUE OF ONYCHOSCOPY NAIL ANALYSIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF NAIL FUNGUS

Thị Huyền Trang Triệu, Nam Liên Hồ, Văn Cấp Lâm, Thị Kim Thanh Trần, Thị Ngọc Yến Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic value, negative diagnostic value of Onychoscopy nail analysis by fungal culture in the diagnosis of nail fungus. Subjects and methods: All patients diagnosed with nail fungus infection were assigned to both Onychoscopy nail analysis and fungal culture during the study period at Hanoi Dermatology Hospital. A Cross-sectional descriptive study was applied. Results: The value of the image characteristics of Onychoscopy analysis to find fungal lesions of the nail using the fungal culture method to determine the fungus: the aurora nail plate (yellow opaque nail, white opaque nail, blue-black nail) has a sensitivity of 81.3-96.6%, a specificity of 51.4-84.6%, a positive diagnostic value of 49.2-93.8%, a negative diagnostic value of 61.1-97.2%, a vertical nail line has a sensitivity of 88.2%, a specificity of 84.8%, a positive diagnostic value of 92.3%, and a negative diagnostic value of 77.7%. Non-specific imaging features of subungual keratosis have a sensitivity of 75.8%, a specificity of 57.1%, a positive diagnostic value of 76.9%, a negative diagnostic value of 55.5% and a nail separation feature with a sensitivity of 66.7%, a specificity of 39.02%, a positive diagnostic value of 61.5%, and a negative diagnostic value of 44.4%. Conclusion: Onychoscopy is a valuable diagnostic test for nail fungus lesions. Therefore, this method can be applied in clinical practice to approach the diagnosis of patients with nail fungus.

Article Details

References

Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases—Estimate Precision. Journal of Fungi. 2017;3(4):57. doi:10.3390/jof3040057
2. Rayens E, Norris KA. Prevalence and Healthcare Burden of Fungal Infections in the United States, 2018. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2022;9(1):ofab593. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofab593
3. Petrucelli MF, de Abreu MH, Cantelli BAM, et al. Epidemiology and Diagnostic Perspectives of Dermatophytoses. J Fungi (Basel). 2020;6(4):310. doi:10.3390/jof6040310
4. Lim SS, Ohn J, Mun JH. Diagnosis of Onychomycosis: From Conventional Techniques and Dermoscopy to Artificial Intelligence. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:637216. doi:10.3389/ fmed.2021.637216
5. Hiền VT, Vân TC, Sáu NH. Đặc điểm tổn thương nấm móng qua phân tích bằng Dermosope. YHCĐ. 2024;65(2). doi:10.52163/ yhc.v65i2.918
6. Litaiem N, Mnif E, Zeglaoui F. Dermoscopy of Onychomycosis: A Systematic Review. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(1):e2023072. doi:10.5826/dpc.1301a72
7. Gupta AK, Hall DC, Cooper EA, Ghannoum MA. Diagnosing Onychomycosis: What’s New? J Fungi (Basel). 2022;8(5): 464. doi:10.3390/ jof8050464
8. Wang H, Xu X, Lj X, Xi P, Ren Q. Systematic Design of a Cross-Polarized Dermoscope for Visual Inspection and Digital Imaging. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine. 2011; 14:26-31. doi:10.1109/MIM.2011.6086897