Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 12/01/2022
Abstract Views: 205
Views PDF: 276
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v509i1.1685
Issue
Vol. 509 No. 1 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Phúc Nguyên, N. ., Thị Truyền, D. ., & Văn Khoa, P. . (2022). COMPARISON OF THE CLEANING EFFICACY OF TWO SINGLE FILE SYSTEMS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 509(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v509i1.1685

COMPARISON OF THE CLEANING EFFICACY OF TWO SINGLE FILE SYSTEMS

Nguyễn Phúc Nguyên1,, Dương Thị Truyền1, Phạm Văn Khoa2
1 Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, Tra Vinh University
2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the cleaning efficacy of two novel single file systems. Methods: Forty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were equally divided into two groups: WOG group prepared by WaveOne Gold file, SAF group prepared by Self-adjusting file. These teeth were sectioned longitudinally and processed for evaluation of debris and smear layer score under Scanning Electronic Microscope at 2 mm, 5 mm and 8mm from the apex by two observers. Results: There were statistically significant differences between two groups in debris score (overall, middle third) and smear layer score (apical third) (p<0,05). Conclusion: The self-adjusting file system is more efficacious than WaveOne Gold system in terms of cleaning debris (overall and middle third) and smear layer (apical third).

Article Details

Keywords

Cleaning efficacy, WaveOne Gold file, Self-adjusting file, endodontic treatment

References

1. Berman L. H., Hargreaves K. M. (2020), Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp- 12th Edition, Elsevier Health Sciences, tr 855-1064.
2. Çapar İ. D., Ari Aydinbelge H. (2014), "Effectiveness of various irrigation activation protocols and the self‐adjusting file system on smear layer and debris removal", Scanning: The Journal of Scanning Microscopies, 36 (6),640-647.
3. Ismail A. G., Nagy M. M., Galal M. (2019), "Cleaning ability of rotary NiTi systems with different kinematics", Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 43 (1),1-5.
4. Jadhav G. R., Mittal P., Kulkarni A. et al. (2016), "Comparative evaluation of canal cleaning ability of various rotary endodontic filesin apical third: A scanning electron microscopic study", Dental research journal, 13 (6),508.
5. Metzger Z., Teperovich E., Cohen R. et al. (2010), "The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer—a scanning electron microscope study", Journal of endodontics, 36 (4),697-702.
6. Ozsu D., Karatas E., Arslan H. et al. (2014), "Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems", European journal of dentistry, 8 (4),504-508.
7. Parente J., Loushine R., Susin L. et al. (2010), "Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system", International Endodontic Journal, 43 (11),1001-1012.
8. Plotino G., Özyürek T., Grande N. M. et al. (2019), "Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study", International Endodontic Journal, 52 (3),343-351.