VERIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY FOR THE TSH CHEMILUMINESCENCE ASSAY ON THE ARCHITECT i2000SR AT CHO RAY HOSPITAL

Văn Thanh Lê 1, Hà Khánh Linh Dương 1,, Minh Trí Lê 2, Thị Bé Vy Trần 3
1 Cho Ray Hospital
2 Nguyen Tat Thanh University
3 Hong Bang International University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To (1) verify the precision, bias, and linearity of the TSH chemiluminescence assay on the Architect i2000SR analyzer at Cho Ray Hospital Biochemistry Department, and (2) estimate the measurement uncertainty (MU) of this assay. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Method verification for precision and bias followed CLSI EP15-A3 guidelines, and linearity followed CLSI EP06. Measurement uncertainty was estimated using a "top-down" approach, utilizing 3 months of internal quality control (QC) data and 3 cycles of external quality assessment (EQA) data. Results: Precision: QC samples (3 levels) showed CVWL (1.90% - 2.04%), meeting manufacturer specifications. Patient serum samples (3 levels) showed CVWL (1.96% - 3.13%), meeting the Upper Verification Limit (UVL). Trueness: QC samples (3 levels) showed %Bias (5.01% - 6.43%), meeting manufacturer specifications (<10%). Linearity: The analytical measurement range of 0.0046 – 82.1327 mIU/L was verified, with R² = 0.9999 and a regression equation of y = 0.9983x - 0.2743. Measurement Uncertainty: The expanded MU (U) was 14.68% (k=2, 95% CI), which is within the desirable Total Allowable Error (TEa) of 23.74%. Conclusion: The TSH assay on the Architect i2000SR system at Cho Ray Hospital meets the verification requirements for precision, trueness, and linearity. The expanded MU of 14.68% is within the desirable quality level, confirming the method's reliability for clinical diagnostics.

Article Details

References

1. Bộ Y tế (2017), Quyết định số 2429/QĐ-BYT-Ban hành tiêu chí đánh giá mức chất lượng phòng xét nghiệm y học, Hà Nội.
2. Nguyễn Thị Phương Cúc và cộng sự (2020), "Áp dụng hướng dẫn EP15A3 của CLSI xác nhận phương pháp định lượng TSH trong sàng lọc sơ sinh", Tạp chí nghiên cứu y học, 128, tr. 26-33.
3. Đặng Thị Nga và cộng sự (2023), "Đánh giá độ không đảm bảo đo và sai số tổng phân tích một số xét nghiệm hóa sinh tại bệnh viện Tim Hà Nội", Tạp chí y học Việt Nam, 529(2), tr. 320-325.
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2014), User Verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline - Third Edition (EP15-A3), CLSI, Wayne, PA.
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2003), Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach (EP06), CLSI, Wayne, PA.
6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2012), Expression of Measurement Uncertainty in Laboratory Medicine (C51-A), CLSI, Wayne, PA.
7. Padoan A., et al. (2018), "Evaluation of the analytical performances of six measurands for thyroid function of Mindray CL-2000i system", Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine.
8. Westgard J. O. (2024), Desirable Biological Variation Database specifications, https://www. westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm.