QUALITY OF LIFE AND RELATED FACTORS IN STAGE II-III PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH OVARIAN SUPPRESSION AND SECONDARY ADJUSTMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is the most common subgroup. Stage II-III patients often require multimodal treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, OFS and long-term endocrine therapy). At this stage, patients often suffer from many cumulative side effects such as vasomotor disorders, musculoskeletal pain, decreased physiological function and psychological disorders, leading to a significant decline in QOL compared to stage I. Subject and method: 103 premenopausal breast cancer patients stage II-III treated at Hanoi Oncology Hospital, from April 2024 to December 2024. Results: The mean age was 42.2 ± 4.8 years. Invasive ductal carcinoma predominated (77.7%), with the mean Ki-67 index being 28.6 ± 19.6; ER and PR were positive in 99.1% and 86.0%, respectively. The mean duration of endocrine therapy (AI combined with ovarian suppression) was 16.2 ± 14.4 months, with 69.9% of the treatment group >6 months. The most commonly reported adverse effects were musculoskeletal pain (53.4%) and hot flashes (77.7%). The median total quality of life score according to FACT-ES was 64.0 (IQR 44.5–83.3). Two factors had a statistically significant association with FACT-ES score: Depression (PHQ-9 ≥10): β = 32 (95% CI: 12–53; p = 0.002); Sleep disturbance (ISI ≥8): β = 14 (95% CI: 1.7–26; p = 0.026) . Conclusions: Despite their important role, OFS and/or AIs are also associated with various adverse effects that can significantly impact the patient's quality of life if not properly managed and may lead to premature treatment discontinuation. Appropriate support strategies are needed to mitigate negative effects and improve the patient's treatment experience
Article Details
Keywords
Quality of life, Breast cancer, Ovarian Suppression, Endocrine therapy.
References
2. Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2022;20(6):691-722. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030.
3. Lim YX, Lim ZL, Ho PJ, Li J. Breast Cancer in Asia: Incidence, Mortality, Early Detection, Mammography Programs, and Risk-Based Screening Initiatives. Cancers. 2022;14(17):4218. doi:10.3390/cancers14174218.
4. Trịnh Lê Huy, Mai Thị Kim Ngân. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị ung thư vú giai đoạn I-III tại bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp Chí Học Việt Nam. 2022;510(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v510i2.2019.
5. Nguyễn Văn Khoa, Hoàng Quang Trung, Lê Ngọc Thanh, Võ Văn Phương, Nguyễn Ngọc Thịnh, Trịnh Lê Huy. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị ung thư vú giai đoạn I-III tại bệnh viện Đa khoa Hà Tĩnh từ 2017-2021. Tạp Chí Học Việt Nam. 2023;529(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v529i2.6523.
6. Vũ Minh Tuấn, Vũ Xuân Thịnh, Phạm Tùng Sơn, et al. Chất lượng cuộc sống của người bệnh ung thư vú tại Bệnh viện K cơ sở Tân Triều Hà Nội. Tạp Chí Khoa Học Điều Dưỡng. 2024;7(03):53-63. doi:10.54436/jns.2024.03.804
7. Lebel S, Maheu C, Lefebvre M, et al. Addressing fear of cancer recurrence among women with cancer: a feasibility and preliminary outcome study. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(3):485-496. doi:10.1007/s11764-014-0357-3.
8. Ganz PA, Petersen L, Bower JE, Crespi CM. Impact of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy on Quality of Life and Symptoms: Observational Data Over 12 Months From the Mind-Body Study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016;34(8):816-824. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3866.