IMAGING FEATURES OF NON - MASS IMAGE - FORMING LESIONS ON DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS

Văn Phước Lê , Thị Thúy Hằng Võ, Ngọc Hoa Phạm , Anh Thư Trần

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has been developed to overcome the limitations of digital mammography by providing clearer depiction of breast structures and reducing tissue overlap, which improves diagnostic accuracy in breast cancer detection. Objective: To describe the imaging features of non-mass lesions on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 70 patients presenting with suspicious breast findings such as microcalcifications, architectural distortion, or focal asymmetry on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), with or without histopathological confirmation. Lesion imaging features were described, and breast lesions were classified according to their DBT characteristics. Results: The patients’ ages ranged from 28 to 72 years. Dense breast tissue (categories C and D) accounted for the majority of cases, with category C being the most common (97.1%) and category D accounting for 2.9%. The most frequent imaging finding was focal asymmetry (45.7%), followed by architectural distortion (40%) and suspicious microcalcifications (14.3%). Among microcalcification patterns, amorphous or pleomorphic types were predominant (70%), and clustered distribution was most common, observed in 60% of cases. Conclusion: Non-mass lesions on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) include suspicious microcalcifications, architectural distortion, and focal asymmetry.

Article Details

References

1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Laversanne M, Colombet M, Mery L, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today [Internet]. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2024. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today.
2. Tình hình bệnh ung thư tại Việt Nam theo GLOBOCAN năm 2022 [Internet]. GLOBOCAN 2022; 2024. Available from: https://nci.vn/tin-tuc/tinh-hinh-benh-ung-thu-tai-viet-nam-theo-globocan-2022-58.
3. Mokhtar O, Abd Elsalam S, Gamal G, Naguib E, Gomaa M. 3D digital breast tomosynthesis versus US in evaluating breast asymmetries. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Aug 14];51(1):110.
4. Lại Thu Hương, Phạm Minh Thông, Lưu Hồng Nhung. Giá trị của cắt lớp tuyến vú kĩ thuật số trong chẩn đoán ung thư vú. Viet J Radiol Nucl Med [Internet]. 2017;26:46-52.
5. Huỳnh Thị Thanh Giang, Nguyễn Hồng Hoa, Nguyễn Minh Tân, Nguyễn Văn Hữu, Nguyễn Thị Thắm, Tống Vân Anh, et al. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm bệnh nhân ung thư vú giai đoạn sớm điều trị nội tiết tại bệnh viện Quân Y 175. VMJ [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 20];526(1B):132-136.
6. Park GE, Kim SH, Lee JM, Kang BJ, Chae BJ. Comparison of Positive Predictive Values of Categorization of Suspicious Calcifications Using the 4th and 5th Editions of BI-RADS. American Journal of Roentgenology [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Jul 1];213(3):710–715.
7. Thu Hà, N. T., Nhung, L. H., Hương, L. T., & Thông, P. M. Nghiên cứu giá trị của X quang cắt lớp trong chẩn đoán ung thư vú ở bệnh nhân có vú đặc hoặc bất xứng khu trú. Tạp chí điện quang và Y học hạt nhân Việt Nam. 2022; 43: 39-46.
8. Ahmed ROAG, Darwish MAE-H, Chalabi NAE, Tantawy SH. Role of tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the assessment of asymmetric breast densities: a comparative prospective study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 5];54(1):112.
9. Ahmadinejad N, others. Our experience using synthesized mammography versus full field digital mammography in breast cancer detection. Eur J Radiol Open. 2023;10:100479.
10. Farghadani M, Ghadiri-Faraz B, Riahinezhad M, Sarami S. A comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammography in detection and characterization of microcalcifications. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 20];(38):1–6.