ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF PATIENTS WITH AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS DIAGNOSED USING THE GOLD COAST CRITERIA

Xuân Cơ Đào 1,2, Thị Liên Lê 1, Hồng Sơn Nguyễn 1, Thế Nhân Võ 1, Văn Tuận Nguyễn 3, Anh Tuấn Nguyễn 2,4, Văn Hùng Hồ 1,2,
1 Bach Mai Hospital
2 Hanoi Medical University
3 Tâm Anh Hospital
4 Vietduc University Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the electrophysiological features of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) diagnosed according to the Gold Coast criteria.  Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 52 ALS patients at Bach Mai Hospital between January 2024 and September 2025. Electrophysiological assessments included motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, F-wave, H-reflex, and needle electromyography across four regions: bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbar.  Results: Most patients were aged 50–69 years (61.5%), with a male predominance. Upper limb nerve conduction showed reduced compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes in the median and ulnar nerves, while distal latency and conduction velocity remained normal. Lower limb motor and sensory parameters were within normal ranges. F-wave frequency was reduced, but latencies were preserved; the H-reflex was present at high frequency and with normal latency. Needle electromyography revealed the highest rates of spontaneous activity and reinnervation in the cervical region (98.1% and 86.5%), followed by the lumbar region, and the lowest in the thoracic region.  Conclusion: Electrophysiological patterns in ALS diagnosed by the Gold Coast criteria demonstrate multi-regional lower motor neuron involvement, most prominent in the cervical and lumbar regions, with preserved sensory conduction. Needle electromyography provides high sensitivity for early detection of LMN abnormalities, supporting timely diagnosis.

Article Details

References

1. Vũ Thị Hinh. Ứng dụng tiêu chuẩn Awaji trong chẩn đoán bệnh xơ cứng cột bên teo cơ. Luận văn Thạc sĩ. TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC Y HÀ NỘI; 2020. Accessed October 28, 2025.
2. Shefner JM, Al-Chalabi A, Baker MR, et al. A proposal for new diagnostic criteria for ALS. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(8):1975-1978.
3. Masrori P, Van Damme P. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical review. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(10):1918-1929. doi:10.1111/ene.14393
4. Gunnarsson LG, Bodin L. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Occupational Exposures: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2371. doi:10.3390/ijerph15112371.
5. Joyce NC, Carter GT. Electrodiagnosis in Persons With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. PM&R. 2013;5(5S). doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.020.
6. Fang J, Cui LY, Liu MS, et al. F Wave Study in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Assessment of Segmental Motoneuronal Dysfunction. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(13):1738-1742. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.159346
7. Pugdahl K, Camdessanché JP, Cengiz B, et al. Gold Coast diagnostic criteria increase sensitivity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 2021;132(12):3183-3189. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2021.08.014
8. Ravits JM, La Spada AR. ALS motor phenotype heterogeneity, focality, and spread. Neurology. 2009;73(10):805-811. doi:10.1212/WNL. 0b013e3181b6bbbd