SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF TIBIAL LENGTHENING FOR STATURE ENHANCEMENT

Văn Đoàn Lê, Phan Ngọc Minh Nguyễn, Phan Minh Khoa Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate bone union results, functional recovery, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction after tibial lengthening surgery using an external fixation frame combine with an intramedullary nail (LON). Subjects: 131 patients with short stature who underwent tibial lengthening surgery to increase height using an external fixation frame combined with an intramedullary nail at Bac Ha International General Hospital, from January 2019 to May 2024. Methods: Retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study without a control group. Results: There were 131 patients (61 males, 70 females), aged 18-40 years. The mean preoperative height of males was 161.61 ± 5.59 cm, and females was 150.75 ± 5.03 cm. The mean lengthening achieved was 7.11 ± 1.17 cm. The mean follow-up time was 24.37 ± 10.99 months. All tibiae were axially aligned; there were no cases of angular deformity, lateral displacement, or external or internal rotation. In 131 patients with 262 lengthening sites, all bones were well aligned; 259/262 (98.86%) bones were large, strong, and stable like normal tibial bone, while 3/262 (1.14%) had large bone defects requiring additional bone grafting. Functional recovery returned to normal as before surgery in 114/131 patients. 17/131 patients were able to walk and perform daily activities normally but still had a few minor limitations. Surgical scars were small and relatively cosmetic. All patients were satisfied with the surgical results and showed improved confidence in daily life. Conclusion: Tibial lengthening using an external fixation frame combined with an intramedullary nail provides solid bone union, good functional and cosmetic recovery, and helps improve height and psychological wellbeing in people with short stature.

Article Details

References

1. Đỗ Tiến Dũng. Đ Điều chỉnh sự chênh lệch độ dài hai chi dưới bằng phương pháp kéo dài chi theo nguyên lí của Ilizarov, 2001. Hà Nội: Học Viện Quân Y; 2001. Available from: http://luanan.nlv.gov.vn/luanan?a=d&d=TTbFfqyuZGeu2001.1.1
2. Nguyen Van L, Le Van D. Complications and functional, psychological outcomes of bilateral tibial lengthening over intramedullary nail: evidence from Vietnam. Int Orthop. 2021;45(8):2007-2015. doi:10.1007/s00264-021-05059-5
3. Catagni MA, Lovisetti L, Guerreschi F, Combi A, Ottaviani G. Cosmetic bilateral leg lengthening: experience of 54 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(10):1402-1405. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B10.16468
4. Guo Q, Zhang T, Zheng Y, Feng S, Ma X, Zhao F. Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail in patients with short stature or leg-length discrepancy: a comparative study. Int Orthop. 2012;36(1):179-184. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1246-2
5. Kim SJ, Mandar A, Song SH, Song HR. Pitfalls of lengthening over an intramedullary nail in tibia: a consecutive case series. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(2):185-191. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1411-5
6. Novikov KI, Subramanyam KN, Muradisinov SO, Novikova OS, Kolesnikova ES. Cosmetic lower limb lengthening by Ilizarov apparatus: what are the risks? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(11):3549-3556. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3782-8
7. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail: a matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(10):1464-1480. doi:10.2106/00004623-199710000-00003
8. Park KB, Kwak YH, Lee JW, Park BK, Park H, Lee DH. Functional recovery of daily living and sports activities after cosmetic bilateral tibia lengthening. Int Orthop. 2019;43(9):2017-2023. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-4159-5
9. Wantanabe K, Tsuchiya H, Sakurakichi K, Yamamoto N, Kabata T, Tomita K. Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(5):480-485. doi:10.1007/s00776-005-0939-z