THE COMBINED PI-RADS CLASSIFICATION VALUE ON MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI ACCORDING TO VERSION 2.1 AND THE PSA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Assessment of clinical effectiveness when combining multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) on patients with prostate biopsy at E Hospital. Subjects and methods: A cross‑sectional descriptive study was conducted on 128 male patients suspected of having PCa, who underwent mpMRI of the prostate followed by transrectal ultrasound‑guided 12‑core prostate biopsy. MRI images were analyzed according to PI‑RADS v2.1 classification, in conjunction with PSA density (PSAD). MRI and PSAD findings were compared with histopathological results of the biopsy. Results: Among 128 patients, 59 (46,1%) were confirmed to have PCa on histopathology. Mean PSAD values were significantly higher in the cancer group compared with the non‑cancer group (p < 0.05). mpMRI demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting PCa, particularly in patients with PI‑RADS 4-5 lesions. When PI‑RADS scores were combined with PSAD (threshold 0.15 ng/mL/cm³), diagnostic specificity and accuracy markedly improved, while reducing unnecessary negative biopsies, especially in patients with PI‑RADS 3 lesions. Conclusions: Both PI‑RADS v2.1 scoring and PSA density individually exhibit high sensitivity and specificity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. However, the combination of PI‑RADS v2.1 and PSA density substantially enhances diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant PCa. This combined approach improves risk stratification and optimizes biopsy indications in clinical practice.
Article Details
Keywords
Prostate cancer, 1.5-T MRI, PSA density, PIRADS v2.1
References
2. Ahmed, Hashim U. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. The Lancet 389, 815-822 (2017) doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1.
3. Yadav, K. et al. Can combined multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and prostate-specific antigen density improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: A prospective single-center cross-sectional study. Journal of cancer research and therapeutics 17, 372-378 (2021) doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_216_20.
4. Washino, S. et al. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients. BJU international 119, 225-233 (2017) doi:10.1111/bju.13465.
5. Cornford, P. et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. European urology 86, 148-163 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027.
6. Schlemmer, H. P. et al. Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 118, 713-719 (2021) doi:10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0309.
7. Haj-Mirzaian, A. et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA network open 7, e244258 (2024) doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258.
8. Stevens, E. et al. Clinical utility of PSAD combined with PI-RADS category for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Urologic oncology 38, 846.e849-846.e816 (2020) doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.05.024.
9. Trần Lê Sơn. et al. Giá trị của thang điểm PIRADS V2.1 trên cộng hưởng từ kết hợp PSA tỷ trọng trong chẩn đoán ung thư tuyến tiền liệt. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam 545, (2024) doi:10.51298/vmj.v545i1.12126.