COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND MODIFIED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR ESTIMATING PULMONARY ARTERY PRESSURE IN COPD PATIENTS AND ITS CORRELATION WITH CHEST COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Thị Thuỳ Linh Trần1, , Văn Công Cung2, Thị Thảo Ly Hoàng2
1 Bệnh viện Quân y 103
2 Bệnh viện Phổi Trung ương

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To compare pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) estimated by the conventional echocardiographic technique and a modified echocardiographic protocol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic PASP and pulmonary artery (PA) dimensions measured on chest computed tomography (CT).


Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 64 COPD patients at the National Lung Hospital between May 2024 and October 2025. All patients underwent transthoracic doppler echocardiography using both conventional and modified techniques to estimate PASP via tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity. Chest CT scans (with or without intravenous contrast) were performed to measure PA diameters.


Results: The mean age was 70.5 ± 1.2 years; 92.2% were male. The median PASP estimated by the conventional technique was 25 mmHg (IQR 22–29) and by the modified technique was 30 mmHg (IQR 25–35; p < 0.001). The detection rate of elevated PASP increased from 29.7% with the conventional technique to 65.7% with the modified one. PASP showed a positive correlation with main, right, and left PA diameters on CT, with stronger correlations using the modified method (ρ = 0.762 for main PA, ρ = 0.492 for right PA, ρ = 0.444 for left PA; p ≤ 0.002). The mean main PA diameter in patients with elevated PASP (by the modified method) was 28.9 ± 2.67 mm, significantly larger than in those without elevation (25.1 ± 1.89 mm; p < 0.001).


Conclusion: The modified echocardiographic protocol detected more cases of elevated PASP and demonstrated stronger correlations with PA dimensions on CT compared to the conventional approach.

Article Details

References

1. Celli B, Fabbri L, Criner G, et al (2022). Definition and Nomenclature of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Time for Its Revision. Am J Respir Crit Care Med;206(11):1317–1325. doi:10.1164/rccm.202204-0671PP
2. Seyyedi SR, Mozafari M, Sharif-Kashani B, et al (2022). Correlation of Echocardiographic and Right Heart Catheterization Estimations of Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure. Tanaffos;21(1):78–84.
3. Ussavarungsi K, Joseph P, Taylor A, et al (2014). The significance of pulmonary artery si ze in pulmonary hypertension. Diseases;2(3):243–259.
4. Mukherjee M, Jankowich M, Galie N, et al (2025). Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults and special considerations in pulmonary hypertension: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr;38(3):141–186.
5. Nguyễn Anh Vũ. Siêu âm tim cập nhật chẩn đoán 2022. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2022.
6. DesJardin JT, Svetlichnaya Y, Kolaitis NA, et al (2023). Echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance in advanced lung disease. Pulm Circ;13(1):e12183. doi:10.1002/pul2.12183.
7. 7. Karnati S, Seimetz M, Kleefeldt F, et al (2021). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and the Cardiovascular System: Vascular Repair and Regeneration as a Therapeutic Target. Front Cardiovasc Med.;8:649512. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.649512.
8. Swift AJ, Dwivedi K, Johns C, et al (2020). Diagnostic accuracy of CT pulmonary angiography in suspected pulmonary hypertension. Eur Radiol. ;30(9):4918–4929. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06846-1.