Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 13/01/2022
Abstract Views: 202
Views PDF: 130
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v509i2.1859
Issue
Vol. 509 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hồng Quang, L. . (2022). AESTHETIC RESULTS OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH IMPLANT AND AFFECTING FACTORS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 509(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v509i2.1859

AESTHETIC RESULTS OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH IMPLANT AND AFFECTING FACTORS

Lê Hồng Quang1,
1 K Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate aesthetic results of breast reconstruction with implant and related factors. Patient and methods: Combined retrospective and prospective description study in 51 breast cancer patients who underwent SSM or NSM and reconstruction with implants at K Hospital from January 2016 to October 2019. Results: Aesthetic score were at a excellent and good level at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery was 82,4%; 76,5%; 70,5%, respectively. The patients group with adjuvant radiotherapy and with capsular contracture had lower aesthetic score than the patients group without radiotherapy and without capsular contracture. Conclusion: Immediate breast reconstruction with implant had good aessthetic results, with aessthetic deterioration over time and in the group of patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy.

Article Details

Keywords

Aesthetic results, breast reconstruction, implant

References

1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., et al. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 71(3), 209–249.
2. Tóth D., Varga Z., Sebő É., et al. (2016). Predictive Factors for Positive Margin and the Surgical Learning Curve in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Localization - Prospective Study of 214 Consecutive Patients. Pathol Oncol Res, 22(1), 209–215.
3. Carlson G.W., Losken A., Moore B., et al. (2001). Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg, 46(3), 222–228.
4. Mioton L.M., Seth A., Gaido J., et al. (2014). Tracking the aesthetic outcomes of prosthetic breast reconstructions that have complications. Plast Surg (Oakv), 22(2), 70–74.
5. Clough K.B., O’Donoghue J.M., Fitoussi A.D., et al. (2001). Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 107(7), 1702–1709.
6. McCarthy C.M., Mehrara B.J., Riedel E., et al. (2008). Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg, 121(6), 1886–1892.
7. Seth A.K. and Cordeiro P.G. (2020). Stability of Long-Term Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evaluation of 12-Year Surgeon- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in 3489 Nonirradiated and Irradiated Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg, 146(3), 474–484.
8. Thomssen C., Balic M., Harbeck N., et al. (2021). St. Gallen/Vienna 2021: A Brief Summary of the Consensus Discussion on Customizing Therapies for Women with Early Breast Cancer. Breast Care, 16(2), 135–143.
9. Ramon Y., Ullmann Y., Moscona R., et al. (1997). Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: a follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg, 99(3), 686–691.