EVALUATION OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX AFTER POEM IN PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA AT TAM ANH GENERAL HOSPITAL, HANOI

Thị Hà Phương Hồ1, , Thị Hương Đinh1, Trần Tiến Đào1, Trường Khanh Vũ1
1 Bệnh viện đa khoa Tâm Anh, Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for achalasia. However, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major concern after the procedure, with widely varying reported rates across recent studies. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of GERD after POEM using both symptom-based and endoscopic assessments, and to analyze associated factors.


Objectives: To evaluate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and associated factors of GERD after POEM in patients with achalasia.


Methods: This retrospective study included 36 patients with achalasia who underwent POEM at Tam Anh General Hospital Hanoi, between 2021 and 2026. Post-POEM GERD was defined based on clinical symptoms using the GERD-Q score (≥8) and/or endoscopic findings according to the Los Angeles classification (≥ grade A). “Silent GERD” was defined as endoscopic esophagitis in the absence of symptoms. Agreement between GERD-Q and endoscopic findings was assessed using the Kappa coefficient. Associations between clinical or endoscopic GERD and potential factors were analyzed using univariate logistic regression.


Results: A total of 36 patients were included, with a mean age of 46,3 ± 15,7 years; 41,7% were male; mean BMI was 21,0 ± 3,8 kg/m²; and achalasia type II was the most common subtype (69,4%). After a median follow-up of 12 months, 9 patients (25,0%) reported reflux symptoms. Among 22 patients who underwent follow-up endoscopy, 13 (59,1%) had reflux esophagitis, predominantly mild (grades A–B in 76,9%). The agreement between GERD-Q and endoscopic findings was low (κ = 0.34), indicating poor concordance between symptoms and mucosal injury. Silent GERD was observed in 61.5% of patients with endoscopic esophagitis. Type I and II achalasia were associated with a significantly lower risk of symptomatic GERD following POEM (p = 0.006). A trend toward increased risk of GERD was observed in patients with BMI ≥ 23 kg/m², although these did not reach statistical significance. No statistically significant associations were found between GERD and age, sex or pre-POEM interventions.


Conclusions: GERD is common after POEM, with a substantial proportion of patients showing endoscopic findings even in the absence of symptoms, although severity is generally mild. Type I and II achalasia reduce the symptoms of GERD, and no other independent risk factors were identified, possibly due to the small sample size. Routine endoscopic follow-up should be considered after POEM.

Article Details

References

1. Akintoye E, Kumar N, Obaitan I, Alayo QA, Thompson CC. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2016;48(12):1059-1068. doi:10.1055/s-0042-114426.
2. Em W, Gmc M, Baj B, P F, Aj B. Incidence and risk factors of reflux esophagitis after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024;36(6). doi:10.1111/nmo.14794.
3. Karyampudi A, Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy is frequently asymptomatic, but leads to more severe esophagitis: A case-control study. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2021;9(1):63-71. doi:10.1177/2050640620947645.
4. Nabi Z, Inavolu P, Duvvuru NR. Prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after per-oral endoscopic myotomy: An update. World J Gastroenterol. 2024;30(9):1096-1107. doi:10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1096.
5. Shiwaku H, Sato H, Shimamura Y, et al. Risk factors and long-term course of gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy: A large-scale multicenter cohort study in Japan. Endoscopy. 2022;54(9):839-847. doi:10.1055/a-1753-9801.
6. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(9):1393-1411. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000731.
7. Vespa E, Pellegatta G, Chandrasekar VT, et al. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2023;55(2):167-175. doi:10.1055/a-1894-0147.
8. Zhang H, Zeng X, Huang S, et al. Mid-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for the Treatment of Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68(4):1386-1396. doi:10.1007/s10620-022-07720-4.