INITIAL EVALUATION OF NEOADJUVANT THERAPY OUTCOMES IN STAGE II - III BREAST CANCER AT TAM ANH GENERAL HOSPITAL, HO CHI MINH CITY

Thị Thiên Hương Trần1, , Tuấn Phúc Ngô1, Tiến Sỹ Nguyễn1, Thị Bé Diệp Kim1
1 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh Tp Hồ Chí Minh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR), pathologic complete response (pCR), nodal conversion, and residual cancer burden (RCB) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with stage II–III breast cancer in real-world clinical practice.


Methods: This retrospective descriptive study included 35 patients with stage II–III breast cancer who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by surgery at Tam Anh General Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, between September 2021 and November 2025. Breast cancer subtypes were classified according to estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Pathologic complete response was defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer in both the breast and regional lymph nodes after treatment (ypT0/is ypN0).


Results: The overall clinical response rate was 65.7%, including a clinical partial response (cPR) rate of 57.1% and a clinical complete response (cCR) rate of 8.6%. The overall pCR rate was 25.7%. Pathologic complete response varied substantially across biological subtypes, reaching 62.5% in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and 66.7% in HER2-positive breast cancer, compared with 8.3% in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative disease. The nodal conversion rate was 35.5%. Treatment-related toxicities were infrequent and manageable. No cases of heart failure were observed, while grade 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 8.6% of patients.


Conclusion: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy achieved pathological responses in patients with stage II–III breast cancer, with response rates varying across biological subtypes. Treatment-related toxicities were generally manageable.

Article Details

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263.
2. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164-172.
3. Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(28):4414-4422.
4. Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, et al. Event-free survival with pembrolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(6):556-567.
5. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere). Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):25-32.
6. Loibl S, Park YH, Shao Z, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in residual HER2-positive early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(9):845-857.
7. Nguyễn Đức Toàn, Lê Tuấn Anh, Đặng Trần Khiêm và cs. Vai trò của hóa trị tân hỗ trợ trong điều trị bệnh nhân ung thư vú tại Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2025;548(số chuyên đề):254-262.
8. Bùi Thanh Tình, Phạm Thanh Hải, Lê Trung Quân và cs. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị tân bổ trợ ung thư vú tại Bệnh viện Ung bướu Đà Nẵng. Tạp chí Y học Lâm sàng. 2020;65:96-101.