QUANTIFICATION OF NERVE FIBER DENSITY IN THE EPIDERMIS FROM SKIN BIOPSY SPECIMEN IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SMALL NERVE FIBER NEUROPATHY

Đặng Anh Thư Phan1, , Thị Yến Vy Lê2, Kiều Trang Hà3, Hoàng Phương Khanh Phan4, Hoàng Minh Đặng1, Trần Quân Đặng1
1 Đại học Y Dược TP. HCM
2 Bệnh viện Đại học Y Dược TP. HCM
3 Bệnh viện Thống Nhất
4 Bệnh viện Ngoại thần kinh Quốc tế

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: This study assesses intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) in skin biopsy samples from patients suspected of small fiber neuropathy (SFN), and describes the clinical characteristics and the relationship between IENFD and sensory neurological symptoms.


Methods: A descriptive case series study was conducted on 10 patients with suspected SFN symptoms. Skin biopsies were taken from standard sites and immunohistochemically stained with PGP 9.5. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density was quantified as the number of fibers/mm of epidermal length and compared to reference values.


Results: The average age of the patients was 52.8 ± 17.3. Reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density was observed in 100% of the cases. Patients with symptoms of burning pain, paresthesia, and thermal sensory disturbances tend to have a more pronounced decrease in IENFD. Over 70% of cases have associated structural abnormalities of nerve fibers, including nerve fiber beaded or segmented.


Conclusion: Quantifying nerve fiber density in the epidermis is an important diagnostic tool, supporting the identification of SFN in appropriate clinical contexts. Skin biopsy combined with PGP 9.5 staining is highly valuable in the practice of neuropathological diagnosis.

Article Details

References

1. McArthur JC, Stocks EA, Hauer P, Cornblath DR, Griffin JW. Epidermal nerve fiber density: normative reference range and diagnostic efficiency. Archives of neurology. 1998 Dec 1;55(12):1513-20.
2. Lauria G, Cornblath DR, Johansson O, et al. EFNS/PNS Guideline on the use of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy. European journal of neurology. 2010 Jul;17(7):903-e49.
3. Devigili G, Tugnoli V, Penza P, et al. The diagnostic criteria for small fibre neuropathy: from symptoms to neuropathology. Brain. 2008 Jul 1;131(7):1912-25.
4. England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, et al. Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Muscle Nerve 39: 106-115, 2009.
5. Hoitsma E, Reulen JP, de Baets M, et al. Small fiber neuropathy: a common and important clinical disorder. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2004 Dec 15;227(1):119-30.
6. Gøransson LG, Mellgren SI, Lindal S, et al. The effect of age and gender on epidermal nerve fiber density. Neurology 2004;62:774.
7. Goodman BP. Approach to the Evaluation of Small Fiber Peripheral Neuropathy and Disorders of Orthostatic Intolerance. Semin Neurol 2007;27:347-355.
8. Umapathi, T., Tan, W. L., Tan, N. C., & Chan, Y. H. (2006). Determinants of epidermal nerve fiber density in normal individuals. Muscle & Nerve: Official Journal of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, 33(6), 742-746.
9. Vinik, A. I., Maser, R. E., Mitchell, B. D., & Freeman, R. (2003). Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes care, 26(5), 1553-1579.
10. Sommer C, Lauria G., Skin biopsy in the management of peripheral neuropathy, Lancet Neurol, 2007, vol. 6 (pg. 632-42)