CURRENT STATUS AND SOME FACTORS RELATED TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICABLE DISEASE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM IN NGHE AN PROVINCE IN 2020 – 2021
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the current status of online report system and analyze some factors related to the quality of case report of two infectious diseases (COVID-19 and viral encephalitis) in Nghe An province in 2020 – 2021. Subjects and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study. In total,72 health workers at 21 district health centers and 15 public hospitals who are responsible for infectious diseases report were interviewed qualitatively and quantitatively on the following factors: human resources operation, direction, equipment and infectious disease reporting software system. At Hospitals, the quality of medical records on COVID-19 and Viral Encephalitis in 2020-2021 were evaluated. Research results: 100% of the District Health Centers had proper reporting process while 33.3% of Hospitals did not have a reporting process. However, 52.3% of district health centers have reported inaccurate information to higher levels. Regarding the quality of case reports at hospitals: 82.8% reported cases of inflammatory disease viral brain and 79.3% of COVID-19 case reports have met thequality standard; There was a significant relationship between the percentage of Units had good quality report with ages and education of the staff in charge of reporting at the unit. The number was higher in the group with more employees under 40 years old and the group with professional qualifications from the University (p<0.05); No correlation between the group which had leaders to manage the implementation of the Circular, the supervision and support of the upper level, and the staff in charge of reporting with the quality of the reports (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Public health units need to strengthen their self-inspection and supervision of the implementation of Circular 54/2015/TT-BYT, especially the quality management of reporting, updating, and feedback data case report.
Article Details
Keywords
Case reporting surveillance, electronic surveillance, communicable diseases report
References
2. Cổng Thông tin điện tử Sở Y Tế Nghệ An. Accessed April 12, 2022. http://www.yte.nghean.gov.vn/wps/portal/soyte
3. Hoàng Nghĩa Thắng, Phạm Thọ Dược, Phạm Ngọc Thanh, Phan Thị Thanh Thảo. Thực trạng triển khai hệ thống báo cáo trường hợp bệnh truyền nhiễm trực tuyến tại các tỉnh Tây Nguyên năm 2017, Tạp chí Y học dự phòng, 2018; 28(7): 73 -77.
4. Đỗ Kiến Quốc, Nguyễn Thị Phương Thúy, Đoàn Ngọc Minh Quân, et al. (2017). Thực trạng triển khai hệ thống báo cáo bệnh truyền nhiễm trực tuyến tại khu vực phía Nam năm 2017. Tạp chí Y học dự phòng, Tập 27, số 11: 385.
5. Bùi Huy Hoàng. (2019). Thực trạng báo cáo các bệnh truyền nhiễm tuyến y tế cơ sở của thành phố Hà Nội năm 2019 và một số yếu tố liên quan. Luận văn thạc sỹ y học dự phòng. 2019: 37-58.
6. JANATI A, HOSSEINY M, GOUYA MM, MORADI G, GHADERI E. Communicable Disease Reporting Systems in the World: A Systematic Review Article. Iran J Public Health. 2015; 44(11):1453-1465.
7. Dehcheshmeh NF, Arab M, Foroushani AR, Farzianpour F. Survey of Communicable Diseases Surveillance System in Hospitals of Iran: A Qualitative Approach. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8(9):44-57.
8. Johnson MG, Williams J, Lee A, Bradley KK. Completeness and Timeliness of Electronic vs. Conventional Laboratory Reporting for Communicable Disease Surveillance—Oklahoma, 2011. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(3):261-266.